P A Abrahamsson1. 1. Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Malmö and Lund, University of Lund, Sweden. peranders.abrahamsson@urokir.lu.se
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Information is presented on prostatic neuroendocrine cells and neuroendocrine differentiation in prostatic carcinoma. The prognostic and therapeutic implications of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostatic carcinoma are reviewed. METHODS: Data are presented that support the intriguing link between neuroendocrine differentiation, tumor progression, and androgen-independent prostate cancer. The hormones, and the receptors, expressed by prostatic neuroendocrine cells are investigated in order to elucidate their significance for prognosis and therapy. RESULTS: The prognostic significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostatic malignancy has been controversial, but recent studies employing markers such as chromogranin A and neuron-specific enolase suggest that neuroendocrine differentiation, as reflected by increased tissue expression and/or blood levels of these neuroendocrine secretory products, correlates with poor prognosis, tumor progression, and androgen-independence. Since all malignant neuroendocrine cells are devoid of androgen receptors and since neuroendocrine phenotypic expression is not suppressed by androgen ablation, clonal propagation of androgen receptor-negative neuroendocrine cells may play an important role in the pathway towards the androgen-independent state of prostatic carcinoma. This would have significant implications for the treatment of prostate cancer, as several of the hormones known to be expressed by neuroendocrine-differentiated, malignant prostatic cells are potential candidates for drug therapy. A limited number of hormones have been tested in this context, in particular somatostatin, bombesin, and serotonin. CONCLUSIONS: Neuroendocrine differentiation in carcinoma of the prostate appears to be associated with poor prognosis, tumor progression, and the androgen-independent state, for which there is currently no successful therapy. Therefore, new therapeutic protocols and trials need to be developed to test drugs based on neuroendocrine hormones and/or their antagonists. An evaluation of this new therapeutic approach against prostatic carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation, including hormone-refractory cancer, is easily justified, since these tumors are unresponsive to current modes of therapy.
BACKGROUND: Information is presented on prostatic neuroendocrine cells and neuroendocrine differentiation in prostatic carcinoma. The prognostic and therapeutic implications of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostatic carcinoma are reviewed. METHODS: Data are presented that support the intriguing link between neuroendocrine differentiation, tumor progression, and androgen-independent prostate cancer. The hormones, and the receptors, expressed by prostatic neuroendocrine cells are investigated in order to elucidate their significance for prognosis and therapy. RESULTS: The prognostic significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostatic malignancy has been controversial, but recent studies employing markers such as chromogranin A and neuron-specific enolase suggest that neuroendocrine differentiation, as reflected by increased tissue expression and/or blood levels of these neuroendocrine secretory products, correlates with poor prognosis, tumor progression, and androgen-independence. Since all malignant neuroendocrine cells are devoid of androgen receptors and since neuroendocrine phenotypic expression is not suppressed by androgen ablation, clonal propagation of androgen receptor-negative neuroendocrine cells may play an important role in the pathway towards the androgen-independent state of prostatic carcinoma. This would have significant implications for the treatment of prostate cancer, as several of the hormones known to be expressed by neuroendocrine-differentiated, malignant prostatic cells are potential candidates for drug therapy. A limited number of hormones have been tested in this context, in particular somatostatin, bombesin, and serotonin. CONCLUSIONS: Neuroendocrine differentiation in carcinoma of the prostate appears to be associated with poor prognosis, tumor progression, and the androgen-independent state, for which there is currently no successful therapy. Therefore, new therapeutic protocols and trials need to be developed to test drugs based on neuroendocrine hormones and/or their antagonists. An evaluation of this new therapeutic approach against prostatic carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation, including hormone-refractory cancer, is easily justified, since these tumors are unresponsive to current modes of therapy.
Authors: Sean R Williamson; Shaobo Zhang; Jorge L Yao; Jiaoti Huang; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Steven Shen; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Gregory T MacLennan; Rodolfo Montironi; Liang Cheng Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2011-04-15 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Christopher J Logothetis; Gary E Gallick; Sankar N Maity; Jeri Kim; Ana Aparicio; Eleni Efstathiou; Sue-Hwa Lin Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Charles C Guo; Jane Y Dancer; Yan Wang; Ana Aparicio; Nora M Navone; Patricia Troncoso; Bogdan A Czerniak Journal: Hum Pathol Date: 2010-10-30 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Laurie E Littlepage; Mark D Sternlicht; Nathalie Rougier; Joanna Phillips; Eugenio Gallo; Ying Yu; Kurt Williams; Audrey Brenot; Jeffrey I Gordon; Zena Werb Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Alfonso Calvo; Carlos Perez-Stable; Victor Segura; Raúl Catena; Elizabeth Guruceaga; Paul Nguewa; David Blanco; Luis Parada; Teresita Reiner; Jeffrey E Green Journal: Prostate Date: 2010-05-01 Impact factor: 4.104