Literature DB >> 10221245

Hydrosalpinges adversely affect implantation in donor oocyte cycles.

M A Cohen1, S R Lindheim, M V Sauer.   

Abstract

Hydrosalpinges have been associated with poor in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome in some, but not all, studies, perhaps through endometrial effects. To determine whether hydrosalpinges affect IVF outcome via endometrial factors alone, we analysed the results of recipients of donor oocytes with hydrosalpinges, thereby controlling for confounding variables, while isolating the intrauterine environment. We retrospectively analysed 110 patients who underwent 121 donor oocyte cycles in a university-based assisted reproduction programme. Thirteen cycles involving recipients (n = 10) with hydrosalpinges were compared to 108 cycles involving recipients (n = 100) without hydrosalpinges. Pregnancy, implantation, miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy rates were compared between women with and without hydrosalpinges. There were no significant differences between the hydrosalpinx and no hydrosalpinx groups with respect to donor age, recipient age, or number or grade of embryos transferred. Patients with a hydrosalpinx had significantly lower embryo implantation rates (7.1 versus 19.3%, P < 0.05) and significantly higher miscarriage (75.0 versus 14.9%, P < 0.05) and ectopic pregnancy rates (33.3 versus 0.0%, P < 0.05) than normal controls. We conclude that the presence of a hydrosalpinx adversely affects early pregnancy events by altering the intrauterine environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10221245     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.4.1087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  6 in total

1.  Trends and correlates of good perinatal outcomes in assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Nikhil Joshi; Dmitry Kissin; John E Anderson; Donna Session; Maurizio Macaluso; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Donor egg IVF model to assess ecological implications for ART success.

Authors:  Lubna Pal; Neiha Kidwai; Jehanzeb Kayani; William B Grant
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Previous tubal ectopic pregnancy raises the incidence of repeated ectopic pregnancies in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer patients.

Authors:  Monika Weigert; Diego Gruber; Elisabeth Pernicka; Peter Bauer; Wilfried Feichtinger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Salpingectomy before assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Marco Noventa; Salvatore Gizzo; Carlo Saccardi; Shara Borgato; Amerigo Vitagliano; Michela Quaranta; Pietro Litta; Michele Gangemi; Guido Ambrosini; Donato D'Antona; Stefano Palomba
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.234

5.  A study of recipient related predictors of success in oocyte donation program.

Authors:  Pooja Gupta; Manish Banker; Pravin Patel; Bhart Joshi
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2012-09

6.  Tubal factor infertility and perinatal risk after assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Jennifer F Kawwass; Sara Crawford; Dmitry M Kissin; Donna R Session; Sheree Boulet; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.