Literature DB >> 10221213

Is there a difference in the function of granulosa-luteal cells in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization either with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist?

Y Lin1, J A Kahn, T Hillensjö.   

Abstract

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) regulates gonadotrophin release. It has been shown that GnRH may have a direct effect on the ovary, as the addition of GnRH to granulosa cell cultures inhibits the production of progesterone and oestradiol. Specific GnRH receptors have been found to be present in rat and human granulosa cells. Desensitization of the pituitary by GnRH agonist has become common in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment, usually by a long protocol of 2-3 weeks. With the introduction of GnRH antagonists, which produce an immediate blockage of the GnRH receptors, a much shorter exposure is needed of 3-6 days. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a GnRH agonist (buserelin) and a GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) on the function of granulosa cells cultured in vitro from IVF patients. Women were treated by IVF randomized either to have buserelin nasal spray from the luteal phase in the previous cycle or cetrorelix from day 6 of the cycle. Both groups had ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) 150 IU daily, i.e. HCG was administered when the follicles were larger than 17 mm, and aspirated 36 h later. Granulosa cells, separated and washed from large follicles containing ova, were pooled. After 48 h of pre-incubation, the granulosa cells were cultured for 4 days in medium with either added testosterone or cAMP with or without HCG, with change of medium after 2 days. The progesterone and oestradiol concentrations in the culture medium were measured by immunological assay, and cellular protein was measured by microprotein assay. The results showed that granulosa cells from women treated with GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) responded earlier to the in-vitro hormone stimulation in terms of progesterone accumulation than women treated with the GnRH agonist (buserelin). This may have been due to difference in time of exposure to the analogue. The results may indicate that the luteal function is less impaired in GnRH antagonist treatment than in GnRH agonist treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10221213     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.4.885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  8 in total

1.  Association of inhibin B serum levels with parameters of follicular response in a randomized controlled trial comparing gnRH agonist versus antagonist protocols for ovarian hyperstimulation.

Authors:  Barbara Sonntag; Ludwig Kiesel; Eberhard Nieschlag; Hermann M Behre
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  A simplified method for preparing IVF granulosa cells for culture.

Authors:  Derek K Lobb; Edward V Younglai
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Comparative analysis of the effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist on the proliferative activity, apoptosis, and steroidogenesis in cultured porcine granulosa cells at varying stages of follicular growth.

Authors:  S Takekida; J Deguchi; T Samoto; H Matsuo; T Maruo
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Serum Oestradiol Pattern during Coasting is Different in Antagonist Cycles Compared with Long Agonist Cycles in In Vitro Fertilisation.

Authors:  Koray Elter; Tijen Alev Ozay; Elif Ergin; Murat Hakan Ozörnek
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.021

5.  Effect of in vivo GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist on hCG and insulin-stimulated progesterone production by human granulosa-lutein cells in vitro.

Authors:  Mohamed F M Mitwally; Robert F Casper
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  A Flexible Multidose GnRH Antagonist versus a Microdose Flare-Up GnRH Agonist Combined with a Flexible Multidose GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders to IVF.

Authors:  Gayem İnayet Turgay Çelik; Havva Kömür Sütçü; Yaşam Kemal Akpak; Münire Erman Akar
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Reassessing the feasibility of the zygote score for predicting embryo viability in IVF/ICSI using the GnRH antagonist protocol compared to the long protocol.

Authors:  Pin-Yao Lin; Fu-Jen Huang; Fu-Tsai Kung; Yi-Chi Lin; Hsin-Ju Chiang; Yu-Ju Lin; Kuo-Chung Lan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Association of follicular fluid volume with membrane stretchability of human metaphase II oocytes following the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol during intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Taketo Inoue; Sayumi Taguchi; Kayoko Hirao; Yoshiko Tsujimoto; Shuji Yamamoto; Mikiko Uemura; Kazunori Miyazaki; Yoshiki Yamashita
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.