BACKGROUND: If no in-house facilities for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) are present, thrombolytic therapy is the treatment of choice for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A few studies have shown benefit from rescue PTCA in patients directly admitted to centers with PTCA facilities. The obvious question arises whether patients with AMI initially admitted to a community hospital can benefit from early transfer for intentional rescue PTCA. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred sixty-five patients were transferred early for intentional rescue PTCA from a community hospital at a distance of 20 miles. On arrival at the angioplasty center, bedside markers were used to determine reperfusion. In case of obvious reperfusion, no invasive procedure was done; otherwise, coronary angiography and rescue PTCA, if necessary, was performed. During transfer, 1 (1%) patient died and 15 (9%) patients had arrhythmic or hemodynamic problems. Median time delay between onset of chest pain and arrival at the community hospital and the PTCA center was 61 minutes (range 0 to 413) and 150 minutes (range 28 to 472), respectively. In 66 (40%) patients, reperfusion was diagnosed by noninvasive reperfusion criteria on arrival at the PTCA center (group 1). Ninety-eight (59%) patients without evident noninvasive criteria of reperfusion underwent angiography 187 median minutes after the onset of chest pain. Forty-one (25%) patients had Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow, and no further intervention was performed (group 2). In the remaining 57 (35%) patients, rescue PTCA was performed, which was successful in 96% (group 3). In-hospital mortality rate was lowest in group 1 compared with the other 2 groups (0% vs 7% vs 11%; P <.05). Reinfarction was highest in group 1 compared with the other groups (17% vs 5% vs 2%; P <.01). No significant differences were found in coronary artery bypass grafting, stroke, or bleeding complications. The 1-year follow-up data showed low revascularization rates; 2 (1%) patients died after discharge from the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Early transfer of patients with large AMI for intentional rescue PTCA can be done with acceptable safety and is feasible within therapeutically acceptable time limits and results in additional early reperfusion in 33% of patients. A large, randomized, multicenter trial is needed to compare efficacy of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in a community hospital versus early referral for either rescue or primary PTCA.
BACKGROUND: If no in-house facilities for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) are present, thrombolytic therapy is the treatment of choice for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A few studies have shown benefit from rescue PTCA in patients directly admitted to centers with PTCA facilities. The obvious question arises whether patients with AMI initially admitted to a community hospital can benefit from early transfer for intentional rescue PTCA. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred sixty-five patients were transferred early for intentional rescue PTCA from a community hospital at a distance of 20 miles. On arrival at the angioplasty center, bedside markers were used to determine reperfusion. In case of obvious reperfusion, no invasive procedure was done; otherwise, coronary angiography and rescue PTCA, if necessary, was performed. During transfer, 1 (1%) patient died and 15 (9%) patients had arrhythmic or hemodynamic problems. Median time delay between onset of chest pain and arrival at the community hospital and the PTCA center was 61 minutes (range 0 to 413) and 150 minutes (range 28 to 472), respectively. In 66 (40%) patients, reperfusion was diagnosed by noninvasive reperfusion criteria on arrival at the PTCA center (group 1). Ninety-eight (59%) patients without evident noninvasive criteria of reperfusion underwent angiography 187 median minutes after the onset of chest pain. Forty-one (25%) patients had Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow, and no further intervention was performed (group 2). In the remaining 57 (35%) patients, rescue PTCA was performed, which was successful in 96% (group 3). In-hospital mortality rate was lowest in group 1 compared with the other 2 groups (0% vs 7% vs 11%; P <.05). Reinfarction was highest in group 1 compared with the other groups (17% vs 5% vs 2%; P <.01). No significant differences were found in coronary artery bypass grafting, stroke, or bleeding complications. The 1-year follow-up data showed low revascularization rates; 2 (1%) patients died after discharge from the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Early transfer of patients with large AMI for intentional rescue PTCA can be done with acceptable safety and is feasible within therapeutically acceptable time limits and results in additional early reperfusion in 33% of patients. A large, randomized, multicenter trial is needed to compare efficacy of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in a community hospital versus early referral for either rescue or primary PTCA.
Authors: A J Ophuis; F W Bär; F Vermeer; W Janssen; P A Doevendans; R J Haest; W R Dassen; H J Wellens Journal: Heart Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: A G C Sutton; P G Campbell; R Graham; D J A Price; J C Gray; E D Grech; J A Hall; A A Harcombe; R A Wright; R H Smith; J J Murphy; A Shyam-Sundar; M J Stewart; A Davies; N J Linker; M A de Belder Journal: Heart Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Warren J Cantor; Jason Burnstein; Richard Choi; Michael Heffernan; Vladimir Dzavik; Charles Lazzam; Marko Duic; David Fitchett; Mary Tan; Janet Wawrzyniak; Saleem Kassam; Sanjay Dhingra; Laurie J Morrison; Anatoly Langer; Shaun G Goodman Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: John M Westfall; Catarina I Kiefe; Norman W Weissman; Anthony Goudie; Robert M Centor; O Dale Williams; Jeroan J Allison Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2008-09-09 Impact factor: 2.298