Literature DB >> 10220114

Metabotrop glutamate receptor type 1a expressing unipolar brush cells in the cerebellar cortex of different species: a comparative quantitative study.

J Takács1, L Markova, Z Borostyánköi, T J Görcs, J Hámori.   

Abstract

Morphology, distribution and number of unipolar brush cells (UBCs) was studied in the cerebellar vermal lobules I-X of the chicken, rat, guinea pig, cat, and monkey using monoclonal mGluR1a antibody as a marker to visualise these recently described nerve cells (Mugnaini and Floris [1994] J. Comp. Neurol. 339:174-180; Mugnaini et al. [1994] Synapse 16:284-311). The morphological appearance of mGluR1a immunopositive UBCs is similar in all species investigated: they are small cells, having a single, relatively short and thick dendrite, terminating in brush-like dendrioles. Although this, probably excitatory, cell type can be found all over the cerebellar cortex, highest density of UBCs can be seen in the vermal cortex. The present study, therefore, was focused on the quantitative morphology and distribution of UBCs in the 10 lobules of the vermis. Calculating the number of UBCs/l Purkinje cell (PC), we have found differences in this value (average in vermal lobules I-X) from 1.04 in rat, 1.10 in chicken, 1.16 in guinea pig, 2.27 in monkey, and up to 2.44 in cat. The highest density of UBCs was observed in lobules I, IX, and X, whereas the lowest number of UBCs/l PC was found in lobules IV-VI (in the mammals) and in lobules VII-VIII (in the chicken). In mammals, particularly the monkey and cat, an increased presence of UBCs was observed in vermal sub-lobules VIc-VIIb,c, a region defined as the oculomotor vermis because of its role in the control of saccadic eye movement. There is also a basic difference between chicken and mammals in the distribution of UBCs within the lobules: in mammals, the lowest density of these nerve cells was found in the peripheral portion of the lobules, near to the pia, while in the chicken, in contrast, the density of UBCs was the highest subpially with fewer UBCs located in the deepest curvature of the lobules. Finally, the functional significance of the differences in the density and in the distribution pattern of UBCs in the cerebellar vermis between the phylogenetically different species investigated is briefly discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10220114     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19990315)55:6<733::AID-JNR8>3.0.CO;2-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Res        ISSN: 0360-4012            Impact factor:   4.164


  10 in total

Review 1.  Metabotropic glutamate receptors in the cerebellum with a focus on their function in Purkinje cells.

Authors:  Thomas Knöpfel; Pedro Grandes
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Efficient generation of reciprocal signals by inhibition.

Authors:  Sung-min Park; Esra Tara; Kamran Khodakhah
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Unipolar brush cells--a new type of excitatory interneuron in the cerebellar cortex and cochlear nuclei of the brainstem.

Authors:  S G Kalinichenko; V E Okhotin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-01

4.  Dynamic metabotropic control of intrinsic firing in cerebellar unipolar brush cells.

Authors:  Marco J Russo; Hau-Jie Yau; Maria-Grazia Nunzi; Enrico Mugnaini; Marco Martina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Differential distribution of phospholipase C beta isoforms and diaglycerol kinase-beta in rodents cerebella corroborates the division of unipolar brush cells into two major subtypes.

Authors:  Gabriella Sekerková; Masahiko Watanabe; Marco Martina; Enrico Mugnaini
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 3.270

6.  ON and OFF unipolar brush cells transform multisensory inputs to the auditory system.

Authors:  Carolina Borges-Merjane; Laurence O Trussell
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 7.  The unipolar brush cell: a remarkable neuron finally receiving deserved attention.

Authors:  Enrico Mugnaini; Gabriella Sekerková; Marco Martina
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2010-11-05

8.  The functional equivalence of ascending and parallel fiber inputs in cerebellar computation.

Authors:  Joy T Walter; Maria-Johanna Dizon; Kamran Khodakhah
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Consensus Paper: Cerebellar Development.

Authors:  Ketty Leto; Marife Arancillo; Esther B E Becker; Annalisa Buffo; Chin Chiang; Baojin Ding; William B Dobyns; Isabelle Dusart; Parthiv Haldipur; Mary E Hatten; Mikio Hoshino; Alexandra L Joyner; Masanobu Kano; Daniel L Kilpatrick; Noriyuki Koibuchi; Silvia Marino; Salvador Martinez; Kathleen J Millen; Thomas O Millner; Takaki Miyata; Elena Parmigiani; Karl Schilling; Gabriella Sekerková; Roy V Sillitoe; Constantino Sotelo; Naofumi Uesaka; Annika Wefers; Richard J T Wingate; Richard Hawkes
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.847

10.  Unipolar (Dendritic) Brush Cells Are Morphologically Complex and Require Tbr2 for Differentiation and Migration.

Authors:  Ashley McDonough; Gina E Elsen; Ray M Daza; Amelia R Bachleda; Donald Pizzo; Olivia M DelleTorri; Robert F Hevner
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 5.152

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.