Literature DB >> 10220026

The gradient in mammography screening behavior: a lifestyle marker.

L Hagoel1, L Ore, E Neter, G Shifroni, G Rennert.   

Abstract

The study reports a gradient in adhering to a recommended health behavior-mammography screening. Data were collected on 951 Israeli women, aged 50-74, who were mailed an invitation to a prescheduled mammography screening appointment and were later phone interviewed about their background, their other health behaviors and their health perceptions related to cancer, mammography and self-rated health. The main finding that emerged was a gradient consisting of three groups defined by their adherence to mammography screening: women who declined the invitation to undergo screening (nonattenders, 32%), women who attended a screening upon encouragement (attenders, 45%) and women who initiated the test on their own (self-screenees, 23%). This gradient was shown to be related to structural/background variables (e.g. SES, age, education, ethnicity), other health behaviors and perceptual variables related to health in general and to cancer. For example, self-screenees were of a higher SES, engaged in more health behaviors and were closer to other women who performed a mammography. An analysis carried out to discern where the difference between the three groups lied showed that it was more apparent between the self-screenees and attenders, and that the attenders and nonattenders were more similar to each other. These findings are discussed in terms of health behavior as a discrete phenomenon vs. reflecting a lifestyle. Suggestions for intervention possibilities are presented in light of the finer ranking proposed above (as opposed to the dichotomy of engaging/not engaging in a health behavior).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10220026     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00434-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  3 in total

1.  Laypersons' views of material incentives for enhancing colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Lea Hagoel; Gad Rennert; Paula Feder-Bubis
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Regional and social inequalities in the performance of Pap test and screening mammography and their correlation with lifestyle: Brazilian national health survey, 2013.

Authors:  Mariza Miranda Theme Filha; Maria do Carmo Leal; Elaine Fernandes Viellas de Oliveira; Ana Paula Esteves-Pereira; Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2016-11-17

3.  Better Ask Than Tell: Responses to mHealth Interrogative Reminders and Associations With Colorectal Cancer Screening Subsequent Uptake in a Prospective Cohort Intervention.

Authors:  Lea Hagoel; Nili Stein; Efrat Neter; Gad Rennert
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 4.773

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.