Literature DB >> 10219865

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy.

R S Chung1, D Y Rowland, P Li, J Diaz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite many randomized controlled trials, the merits of laparoscopic appendectomy remain unclear. A meta-analysis may provide insights not evident from any individual studies. DATA SOURCES: Systematic literature search yielded 17 trials (1,962 subjects) of true randomized design with usable statistical data comparing laparoscopic and conventional appendectomy in adults. The effect sizes for operating time, hospitalization, postoperative pain, return to normal activity, wound infection, and intra-abdominal abscess were calculated, using the random effects model to allow for heterogeneity. An estimate of the robustness of all positive findings was also calculated.
RESULTS: Modest but statistically significant effect sizes were found for four of the six outcome measures. Laparoscopic appendectomy takes 31% longer to perform, but results in less postoperative pain, faster recovery (by 35%), and lower wound infection rates (by 60%).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic appendectomy offers significant improvement in postoperative outcomes at the cost of a longer operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10219865     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00017-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  84 in total

1.  Does laparoscopic appendectomy impart an advantage over open appendectomy in elderly patients?

Authors:  Hossein Masoomi; Steven Mills; Matthew O Dolich; Noor Ketana; Joseph C Carmichael; Ninh T Nguyen; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Port site necrotising fasciitis following laparoscopic appendicectomy.

Authors:  Gargeshwari K G Raghavendra; Sarah Mills; Michael Carr
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2010-10-12

3.  Impact of AITS laparoscopic training center on surgeons' preference for appendectomy.

Authors:  Hung-Wen Lai; Shih-Horng Tseng; Yueh-Tsung Lee; Chih-Hung Hsu; Dev-Aur Chou; Hurng-Sheng Wu; Min-Ho Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Cost perspectives of laparoscopic and open appendectomy.

Authors:  D E Moore; T Speroff; E Grogan; B Poulose; M D Holzman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Omer Aziz; Thanos Athanasiou; Paris P Tekkis; Sanjay Purkayastha; James Haddow; Vitali Malinovski; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  Heng-Fu Lin; Jiann-Ming Wu; Li-Ming Tseng; Kuo-Hsin Chen; Shih-Horng Huang; I-Rue Lai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Laparoscopic surgery--15 years after clinical introduction.

Authors:  Reinhard Bittner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Value of laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly patient.

Authors:  Boris Kirshtein; Zvi Howard Perry; Solly Mizrahi; Leonid Lantsberg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Minimum postoperative antibiotic duration in advanced appendicitis in children: a review.

Authors:  Carolyn M H Snelling; Dan Poenaru; John W Drover
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 1.827

10.  Transumbilical single port laparoscopic appendectomy using basic equipment: a comparison with the three ports method.

Authors:  Jun Suh Lee; Young Il Choi; Sung Ho Lim; Tae Ho Hong
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2012-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.