Literature DB >> 10219381

The effect of click repetition rate on vestibular evoked myogenic potential.

C H Wu1, T Murofushi.   

Abstract

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) generated by click stimulation and recorded on the sternocleidomastoid muscle have been used as a test of vestibular reflexes. Various parameters of the stimulus and recording setting have been studied. However, the influence of stimulation repetition rate of VEMPs and the most optimal stimulation rate for clinical use have not yet been defined. Each ear of 12 normal adults was tested at five different click stimulation rates (1 Hz, 5 Hz, 10 Hz, 15 Hz and 20 Hz) in random order. VEMP responses were evident in all 24 ears stimulated with 1 Hz, 5 Hz and 10 Hz. One ear was void of response at 15 Hz stimulation and nine ears at 20 Hz stimulation. The relative amplitude or the rank of amplitude in individual ears was higher at 1 Hz and 5 Hz stimulation, progressively decreasing as the stimulation rate increased. Comparisons of p13 and n23 latencies showed no difference among five stimulation rates, but variance was greatest at 20 Hz stimulation and smallest at 1 Hz. VEMPs generated at lower stimulation repetition rate seemed to be more marked and constant. However, with regard to examination time and patient compliance, a 5 Hz stimulus is advisable if both short examination time and higher signal/noise ratio are required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10219381     DOI: 10.1080/00016489950181891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  7 in total

1.  Stabilometric signal analysis in tests with sound stimuli.

Authors:  Míriam Raquel Meira Mainenti; Líliam Fernandes De Oliveira; Marco Antonio De Melo Tavares De Lima; Jurandir Nadal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) testing: normative threshold response curves and effects of age.

Authors:  Kristen L Janky; Neil Shepard
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  The effect of stimulation rate on cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential quality.

Authors:  Faten S Obeidat; Steven L Bell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2017-12-14

4.  Optimizing Stimulus Repetition Rate for Recording Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Elicited by Air-Conduction Tone Bursts of 500 Hz.

Authors:  Niraj Kumar Singh; Peter Kadisonga; Palliyath Ashitha
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2014-06-03

5.  The impact of stimulation rates in vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing.

Authors:  Aline Tenório Lins Carnaúba; Otávio Gomes Lins; Ilka do Amaral Soares; Kelly Cristina Lira de Andrade; Pedro de Lemos Menezes
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct

6.  Vestibular evoked myogenic potential: new perspectives in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Renata Chade Aidar; Fábio A Suzuki
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-02

Review 7.  Vestibular evoked myogenic potential: recording methods in humans and guinea pigs.

Authors:  Aline Cabral de Oliveira; Ricardo David; José Fernando Colafêmina
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.