Literature DB >> 10219134

Bone behavior around sleeping and non-sleeping implants retaining a mandibular hinging overdenture.

I Naert1, S Gizani, D van Steenberghe.   

Abstract

Since 1984 2 implants in the symphyseal area have been used in our center to retain a hinging overdenture. Because this technique was unknown at that time 1 extra implant was installed in between the 2 others and was left submerged (sleeping). The extra implant served as a rescue implant in case 1 of the 2 others would fail. It was the aim of the present report to compare the marginal bone behavior around those sleeping and non-sleeping implants. Between 1984 and 1987 20 completely edentulous patients were provided with 3 implants (Brånemark system), where from 2 were used to retain a hinging overdenture. Ten years later half of the patients could still be traced. Retroalveolar radiographs were made at the abutment installation and after 10 years. None of the non-sleeping or sleeping implants lost, at an individual basis, more than 1.6 and 0.7 mm of marginal bone respectively. On average, non-sleeping implants lost at the right- and left-hand side of the mandible 0.33 and 0.57 mm of bone respectively. However, sleeping implants lost on average 0.16 mm only. Thus non-sleeping implants lose on average more bone when compared to sleeping implants. Surgical trauma at the abutment connection is believed to be the most plausible cause of marginal bone loss around non-sleeping implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10219134     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100209.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  3 in total

Review 1.  To what extent residual alveolar ridge can be preserved by implant? A systematic review.

Authors:  Ahmed Khalifa Khalifa; Masahiro Wada; Kazunori Ikebe; Yoshinobu Maeda
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2016-11-23

2.  Effects of immediate and delayed loading protocols on marginal bone loss around implants in unsplinted mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Liu; He Cai; Junjiang Zhang; Jian Wang; Lei Sui
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Using Resonance Frequency Analysis to Compare Delayed and Immediate Progressive Loading for Implants Placed in the Posterior Maxilla: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Mohammed Jasim Al Juboori; Mohammed Ahmed Al Attas; Raquel Zita Gomes; Basma Fathi Alanbari
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2018-10-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.