Literature DB >> 10217393

Development and validation of the Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire.

W Shen1, J G Kotsanos, W J Huster, S D Mathias, C M Andrejasich, D L Patrick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a valid and reliable health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaire for use in multinational clinical trials of patients with type I and type II diabetes.
METHODS: Through patient focus groups and expert clinician panels in the United States (US) and France, relevant HRQOL domains for patients with type I and type II diabetes were identified. A draft questionnaire was developed by including validated, widely used generic and diabetes-specific domains and by developing original questions as required. A pilot study (n = 123) was conducted to evaluate the psychometric properties of the draft questionnaire with revisions being subsequently made. Data collected from two multinational clinical trials of patients with type I and type II diabetes were used to further validate and enhance the questionnaire (DQLCTQ).
RESULTS: A total of 942 patients were recruited in the clinical trials from Canada, France, Germany, and the United States. The mean age was 33.8 years for patients with type I diabetes (n = 468) and 58.2 years for patients with type II diabetes (n = 474). The mean HbAlc level at baseline was 8.6. The revised version of the questionnaire (DQLCTQ-R) contains a total of 57 questions comprising 8 generic and disease-specific domains, as follows: Physical Function; Energy/Fatigue; Health Distress; Mental Health; Satisfaction; Treatment Satisfaction; Treatment Flexibility; and Frequency of Symptoms. Intraclass correlation coefficients range from 0.74 to 0.90 and Cronbach's alphas range from 0.77 to 0.90. With very few exceptions, all eight domains were able to discriminate between type I and type II diabetes, tight and poor metabolic control, male and female, and good and poor self perceived control of diabetes. Four domains (Treatment Satisfaction, Health/Distress, Mental Health, and Satisfaction) were responsive to clinical change in metabolic control.
CONCLUSION: The DQLCTQ-R is a reliable, valid, and comprehensive HRQOL instrument. It is suitable in multinational clinical trials to evaluate new or alternative treatments for patients with type I and type II diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10217393     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199904001-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  24 in total

1.  Issues in conducting cross-cultural research: implementation of an agreed international protocol [corrected] designed by the WHOQOL Group for the conduct of focus groups eliciting the quality of life of older adults.

Authors:  Graeme Hawthorne; Natasha Davidson; Kathryn Quinn; Farah McCrate; Ines Winkler; Ramona Lucas; Reinhold Kilian; Anita Molzahn
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Measurement of health-related QOL in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Ken Watkins; Cathleen M Connell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Columbia University's Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel) Project: rationale and design.

Authors:  Steven Shea; Justin Starren; Ruth S Weinstock; Paul E Knudson; Jeanne Teresi; Douglas Holmes; Walter Palmas; Lesley Field; Robin Goland; Catherine Tuck; George Hripcsak; Linnea Capps; David Liss
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Insulin lispro: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Christopher J Dunn; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Utilities and disutilities for attributes of injectable treatments for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Kristina S Boye; Louis S Matza; Kimberly N Walter; Kate Van Brunt; Andrew C Palsgrove; Aodan Tynan
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-03-12

6.  Feasibility and Acceptability of Ecological Momentary Assessment of Psychosocial Factors and Self-Management Behaviors Among Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Jennalee S Wooldridge; Emily C Soriano; Devon E Harris; Niloofar Afari
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2022-02-08

7.  Coping with Type II diabetes: the patient's perspective.

Authors:  M Koopmanschap
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.122

8.  Insulin-based versus triple oral therapy for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: which is better?

Authors:  Ildiko Lingvay; Jaime L Legendre; Polina F Kaloyanova; Song Zhang; Beverley Adams-Huet; Philip Raskin
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  The development and psychometric evaluation of the Motivation and Energy Inventory (MEI).

Authors:  S E Fehnel; C M Bann; S L Hogue; W J Kwong; S S Mahajan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Factors related to perceived diabetes control are not related to actual glucose control for minority patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Lisa M McAndrew; Carol R Horowitz; Kristie J Lancaster; Howard Leventhal
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 17.152

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.