Literature DB >> 10216791

[Recurrence and satisfaction levels following onysectomy with or without phenolization].

F Légaré1, S Dubé, A Naud, L Laperrière, L Turcot.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare recurrence and satisfaction levels among patients undergoing onysectomy with phenolization (OP) and without phenolization (OS).
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Family practice unit. PARTICIPANTS: All patients (N = 35) undergoing onysectomy between September 1992 and May 1993, and between January 1996 and February 1997. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Type of onysectomy (OP or OS) was taken from the patient's medical record. A telephone interview was used to determine whether patients had experienced recurrence; satisfaction was measured retrospectively at diagnosis, at time of surgery, and after surgery using a five-point scale (very unsatisfied to very satisfied).
RESULTS: Among the 30 patients interviewed by telephone, four of the six patients in the OS group experienced recurrence, and four of the 24 patients in the OP group experienced recurrence. (Fisher's exact test, P = .007). In the OS group, satisfaction levels at diagnosis, during surgery, and after surgery were 4.7, 4.5, and 4.2, respectively. In the OP group, satisfaction levels at these three points were 4.3, 4.2, and 4.4, respectively. Notwithstanding technique used, a connection was noted between recurrence and satisfaction level at the time of the telephone interview (repeated measures test, P = .036).
CONCLUSION: In general medicine, onysectomy with phenolization could be the treatment of choice for ingrown toenails.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10216791      PMCID: PMC2328298     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  13 in total

1.  Re-operation rate for ingrowing toe nail treated by phenolization: 3 year follow-up.

Authors:  M R Young; W H Rutherford
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Risk factors in onychocryptosis.

Authors:  D T Langford; C Burke; K Robertson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Follow-up study of patients treated for ingrown nails with the nail matrix phenolization method.

Authors:  Y Kimata; M Uetake; S Tsukada; K Harii
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Surgical wedge excision versus phenol wedge cauterisation for ingrowing toenail. A controlled study.

Authors:  J S Varma; A W Kinninmonth; D W Hamer-Hodges
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1983-09

5.  Segmental phenolization of ingrowing toenails: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  A J Morkane; R W Robertson; G S Inglis
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Treatment of ingrown toenail.

Authors:  G L Dixon
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1983 Mar-Apr

7.  The treatment of ingrowing toenails. A randomised comparison of wedge excision and phenol cauterisation.

Authors:  A C van der Ham; C A Hackeng; T I Yo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-05

8.  Ingrowing toenails: improving treatment.

Authors:  A L Leahy; C I Timon; A Craig; R B Stephens
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Ingrowing toenails: an evaluation of two treatments.

Authors:  P F Cameron
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-09-26

10.  Wedge resection alone or combined with segmental phenolization for the treatment of ingrowing toenail.

Authors:  G J Fulton; M K O'Donohoe; J V Reynolds; F B Keane; W A Tanner
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.