Literature DB >> 10215113

A comparison of the use of Papanicolaou-stained cervical cytological smears with Gram-stained vaginal smears for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy.

R F Lamont1, E A Hudson, P E Hay, D J Morgan, V Modi, C A Ison, D Taylor-Robinson.   

Abstract

Our objective is to compare the efficacy of using Papanicolaou (PAP)-stained cervical cytology smears with a standardized method of interpreting Gram-stained vaginal smears for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis (BV) in pregnancy. High vaginal smears were Gram-stained and examined by a single observer to characterize 3 grades of vaginal flora and diagnose BV. Cervical smears were PAP-stained and examined for characteristic patterns of vaginal flora including evidence of BV by either a number of cytotechnicians or a single cytopathologist. The results of the 2 methods were compared. Seven hundred and forty-seven women attending an antenatal clinic in a district general hospital who consented to have a smear of vaginal secretions and cervical cytology in early pregnancy. The main outcome measure is the diagnosis of BV by different methods in a pregnant population. Compared with the Gram-stain method for the diagnosis of BV, there was good agreement between PAP-stain interpretation by a single observer but the agreement was not as good with PAP-stain interpretation by multiple cytotechnicians. When the grades were consolidated to normal (grade I) and abnormal flora (grades II and III), compared to Gram-stained smears, PAP cytology undertaken by several cytotechnicians had a sensitivity of 80.7% and a specificity of 90.7%. The sensitivity and specificity increased to 87% and 97%, respectively, when the PAP-stained smears were read by a single cytopathologist. Using kappa scores, only those readings made by a single cytopathologist were reliable. The setting in a cytopathology laboratory comprises multiple cytotechnicians, so that PAP-stain analysis of vaginal smears for the diagnosis of BV is likely to provide results which are less reliable than those obtained by Gram staining. The latter should be the first choice and every effort should be made to set up this service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10215113     DOI: 10.1258/0956462991913709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J STD AIDS        ISSN: 0956-4624            Impact factor:   1.359


  6 in total

Review 1.  The vaginal microbiome: new information about genital tract flora using molecular based techniques.

Authors:  R F Lamont; J D Sobel; R A Akins; S S Hassan; T Chaiworapongsa; J P Kusanovic; R Romero
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Assessment of two alternative sample transport and fixation methods in the microbiological diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Erica Eason; Baldwin Toye; George A Wells; Mary Senterman
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2003-11

3.  The laboratory diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Deborah Money
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  The impact of γ-irradiation on the induction of bystander killing by genetically engineered ovarian tumor cells: implications for clinical use.

Authors:  Jehad Zweiri; Stephen E Christmas
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 5.722

5.  Comparison of Gram stain and Pap smear procedures in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Enver Vardar; Izzet Maral; Murat Inal; Ozgül Ozgüder; Funda Tasli; Hakan Postaci
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002

6.  Evaluation of microbial enzymes in normal and abnormal cervicovaginal fluids of cervical dysplasia: a case control study.

Authors:  Subramanyam Dasari; Wudayagiri Rajendra; Lokanatha Valluru
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.