Literature DB >> 10215090

Brain activation during dichotic presentations of consonant-vowel and musical instrument stimuli: a 15O-PET study.

K Hugdahl1, K Brønnick, S Kyllingsbaek, I Law, A Gade, O B Paulson.   

Abstract

Dichotic listening means that two different stimuli are presented at the same time, one in each ear. This technique is frequently used in experimental and clinical studies as a measure of hemispheric specialization. The primary aim of the present study was to record regional changes in the distribution of cerebral blood flow (CBF) with the 15O-PET technique to dichotically presented consonant-vowel (CV) and musical instrument stimuli, in order to test the basic assumption of differential hemispheric involvement when stimuli presented to one ear dominate over stimuli presented in the other ear. All stimuli were 380 ms in duration with a 1000 ms interstimulus interval, and were presented in blocks of either CV-syllable or musical instrument pairs. Twelve normal healthy subjects had to press a button whenever they detected a CV-syllable or a musical instrument target in a stream of CV- and musical instrument distractor stimuli. The targets appeared equally often in the right and left ear channel. The CV-syllable and musical instrument targets activated bilateral areas in the superior temporal gyri. However, there were significant interactions with regard to asymmetry of the magnitude of peak activation in the significant activation clusters. The CV-syllables resulted in greater neural activation in the left temporal lobe while the musical instruments resulted in greater neural activation in the right temporal lobe. Within-subjects correlations between magnitude of dichotic listening and CBF asymmetry were, however, non-significant. The changes in neural activation were closely mimicked by the performance data which showed a right ear superiority in response accuracy for the CV-syllables, and a left ear superiority for the musical instruments. In addition to the temporal lobe activations, there were activation tendencies in the left inferior frontal lobe, right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, left occipital lobe, and cerebellum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10215090     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00101-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  28 in total

1.  Effects of attention on dichotic listening: an 15O-PET study.

Authors:  K Hugdahl; I Law; S Kyllingsbaek; K Brønnick; A Gade; O B Paulson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Neuromagnetic functional coupling during dichotic listening of speech sounds.

Authors:  Alfredo Brancucci; Stefania Della Penna; Claudio Babiloni; Fabrizio Vecchio; Paolo Capotosto; Davide Rossi; Raffaella Franciotti; Kathya Torquati; Vittorio Pizzella; Paolo M Rossini; Gian Luca Romani
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Rapid brain discrimination of sounds of objects.

Authors:  Micah M Murray; Christian Camen; Sara L Gonzalez Andino; Pierre Bovet; Stephanie Clarke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Neural specializations for speech and pitch: moving beyond the dichotomies.

Authors:  Robert J Zatorre; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Detection of differential speech-specific processes in the temporal lobe using fMRI and a dynamic "sound morphing" technique.

Authors:  Karsten Specht; Berge Osnes; Kenneth Hugdahl
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Are you listening? Brain activation associated with sustained nonspatial auditory attention in the presence and absence of stimulation.

Authors:  Anna Seydell-Greenwald; Adam S Greenberg; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Task-modulated "what" and "where" pathways in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Tommi Raij; Giorgio Bonmassar; Sasha Devore; Matti Hämäläinen; Sari Levänen; Fa-Hsuan Lin; Mikko Sams; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Thomas Witzel; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The effects of the glutamate antagonist memantine on brain activation to an auditory perception task.

Authors:  Heidi van Wageningen; Hugo A Jørgensen; Karsten Specht; Tom Eichele; Kenneth Hugdahl
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Vowel identity between note labels confuses pitch identification in non-absolute pitch possessors.

Authors:  Alfredo Brancucci; Rosanna Dipinto; Ilaria Mosesso; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Rachel Hull; Heather Bortfeld; Susan Koons
Journal:  Open Neuroimag J       Date:  2009-04-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.