Literature DB >> 10214838

Predictors of persistence of adnexal masses in pregnancy.

L M Bernhard1, P K Klebba, D L Gray, D G Mutch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine factors predicting the persistence of sonographically identified adnexal masses in pregnancy.
METHODS: All patients from March 1988 to April 1993 diagnosed with an adnexal mass by obstetric sonography were reviewed. Examinations had been entered prospectively into our sonography database. Follow-up data were collected from the database, from hospital and pathology department records, and from interviews with referring obstetricians. Adnexal masses were characterized by size, sonographic appearance, and anatomic site. Persistence of the masses was determined by subsequent sonography, operative findings, or postpartum physical examinations.
RESULTS: The rate of adnexal masses during pregnancy was 2.3% (432 of 18,391). Complete follow-up was available for 422 of 432. Most of the adnexal masses (76%; 320 of 422) were simple cysts with a mean diameter less than 5 cm. The remainder of the masses were simple or complex, measuring 5 cm or more in diameter. Seventy of 102 large or complex masses resolved. By multivariate analysis, the best predictors for persistence of these masses were complex appearance on sonography and size of the mass (P < .05 for both categories).
CONCLUSION: Most adnexal masses identified by sonography during pregnancy were small, simple cysts that did not pose a risk to the pregnancy. Even the majority of large or sonographically complex masses resolved. The best predictors of persistence of the masses were sonographic appearance and size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10214838     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00490-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  12 in total

1.  A pelvic mass on ultrasonography and high human chorionic gonadotropin level: not always an ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Alexandre Rozenholc; Jasmine Abdulcadir; Marie-Françoise Pelte; Patrick Petignat
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-06-01

2.  Robotic surgery for adnexal masses in pregnancy.

Authors:  Lauren A Baldwin; Iwona Podzielinski; Scott T Goodrich; Leigh G Seamon
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-03-09

3.  Surgical intervention for adnexal masses during pregnancy.

Authors:  E Telli; O T Yalcin; S S Ozalp; H Hassa
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-06-28

4.  Diagnosis and management of adnexal masses in pregnancy.

Authors:  Ibrahim Adamu Yakasai; Lawal Abdullahi Bappa
Journal:  J Surg Tech Case Rep       Date:  2012-07

5.  Primary Fallopian Tube Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma in Pregnancy: Case Presentation and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Mohammed Malak; Stephanie Klam
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-05-21

Review 6.  Management of ovarian cysts and cancer in pregnancy.

Authors:  J de Haan; M Verheecke; F Amant
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2015

7.  [Ovarian torsion during the postpartum period: about a case].

Authors:  Houda Chattri; Meryem Kouara; Khadija Chetouani
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2019-07-19

Review 8.  Investigation and Management of Adnexal Masses in Pregnancy.

Authors:  João Cavaco-Gomes; Cátia Jorge Moreira; Anabela Rocha; Raquel Mota; Vera Paiva; Antónia Costa
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2016-03-28

9.  A rare case of paratubal cystadenoma during pregnancy.

Authors:  Umit Gorkem; Tunay Efeturk; I Tayfun Sahiner; Yılmaz Bas; Mete Dolapcı; Tayfun Gungor
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-01-20

Review 10.  Adnexal masses in pregnancy: An updated review.

Authors:  Abdullah M Hakoun; Iyad AbouAl-Shaar; Khaled J Zaza; Hussam Abou-Al-Shaar; Mohammad Nour A Salloum
Journal:  Avicenna J Med       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.