Literature DB >> 10214787

Percutaneous tracheostomy: a comprehensive evaluation.

K S Moe1, S J Stoeckli, S Schmid, E A Weymuller.   

Abstract

Percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) is an ancient procedure that has recently attracted increasing interest. While there are numerous publications in the literature, there remains confusion due to the large variety of techniques and instruments with which it has been performed and the wide disparity in clinical outcome. This study evaluates the international literature on over 1,500 cases, classifies the techniques that have been used, analyzes the safety of each method, and reports a prospective outcome and cost analysis of 130 cases undergoing what we determined to be the safest method. We found that PT performed with the correct instruments and technique under bronchoscopic surveillance has a lower incidence of complications than open tracheostomy (OT). Cost estimation demonstrated that PT may be significantly more expensive than bedside OT. While we recommend PT as a relatively safe and expedient method of tracheostomy for selected intubated patients in an intensive care unit, it does not offer an advantage for patients who must be taken to the operating room, and should not deprive house officers of necessary experience in OT in this setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10214787     DOI: 10.1177/000348949910800412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  8 in total

1.  Outcome of bedside percutaneous tracheostomy with bronchoscopic guidance.

Authors:  S Shah; P Morgan
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Otorhinolaryngological problems occurring within the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Yehudah Roth; Maxim Sokolov; Moshe Adler; Tiberiu Ezry; Moshe Harell
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Percutaneous tracheostomy: comparison of Ciaglia and Griggs techniques.

Authors:  K M Kost
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Incidence of tracheal stenosis and other late complications after percutaneous tracheostomy.

Authors:  S Norwood; V L Vallina; K Short; M Saigusa; L G Fernandez; J W McLarty
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Conventional Tracheostomy Versus Percutaneous Tracheostomy: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Praveen Kumar Thakur; Anil Kumar Jain; Tahir Ali Khan; Sanyogita Jain
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-04-10

6.  Comparative study of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy and conventional tracheostomy in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  A Ravi Kumar; Sanjeev Mohanty; K Senthil; M Gopinath
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-07

7.  Percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy: which technique is the best for the critically ill patient, and how can we gather further scientific evidence?

Authors:  Ansgar Brambrink
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Serum interleukin 1β in patients with acquired laryngotracheal stenosis.

Authors:  Norazwani Azwal; Yogeswaran Lokanathan; Mawaddah Azman; Min Hwei Ng; Abdullah Sani Mohamed; Marina Mat Baki
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 2.618

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.