Literature DB >> 10213099

Treatment of lower ureteral stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or intracorporeal lithotripsy?

H Biri1, B Küpeli, K Isen, Z Sinik, U Karaoğlan, I Bozkirli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study, 1121 patients with lower ureteral stones were evaluated to compare the effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy with three different lithotripsy modalities.
METHODS: Of these patients, 726 were treated with SWL, whereas 430 underwent ureteroscopy, with pneumatic lithotripsy (PL), ultrasonic lithotripsy (USL), and electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) performed in 125 (29.0%), 276 (64.2%), and 29 (6.8%) patients, respectively. Thirty-five patients underwent both types of treatment because of unsuccessful SWL therapy.
RESULTS: In the SWL group, the stone-free rate was 42.2% and the fragmentation rate was 59.5%. These values were 96.8% and 98.4% for PL, 89.4% and 90.5% for USL, 93.1% and 96.5% for EHL, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: These data show that SWL was less effective than ureteroscopic lithotripsy (p < 0.001). The PL modality had the highest stone-free and fragmentation rate, and EHL had the highest complication rate (43.5%). Ureteroscopic lithotripsy is the most effective treatment choice in lower ureteral stones no matter which kind of energy is used, and PL is the most effective and least morbid approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10213099     DOI: 10.1089/end.1999.13.77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  5 in total

Review 1.  Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-05-29

2.  Minimally invasive treatment of ureteral calculi in children.

Authors:  Mustafa Ozgur Tan; Ustunol Karaoglan; Sinan Sozen; Hasan Biri; Nuri Deniz; Ibrahim Bozkirli
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2006-12

3.  Factors influencing the failure of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with Piezolith 3000 in the management of solitary ureteral stone.

Authors:  Insang Hwang; Seung-Il Jung; Kwang Ho Kim; Eu Chang Hwang; Ho Song Yu; Sun-Ouck Kim; Taek Won Kang; Dong Deuk Kwon; Kwangsung Park
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Ureteroscopic lithotripsy using Swiss Lithoclast for treatment of ureteral calculi: 12-years experience.

Authors:  Young Kwon Hong; Dong Soo Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Comparison of ESWL and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in management of ureteral stones.

Authors:  Yon Cui; Wenzhou Cao; Hua Shen; Jianjun Xie; Tamara S Adams; Yuanyuan Zhang; Qiang Shao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.