Literature DB >> 10213044

Frequency of meiotic trisomy depends on involved chromosome and mode of ascertainment.

W P Robinson1, F Bernasconi, A Lau, D E McFadden.   

Abstract

Although maternal meiotic errors predominate in most studies of nonmosaic trisomy, studies of trisomy ascertained through confined placental mosaicism (CPM) have shown a high rate of somatic errors. However, origin of trisomy of many of the chromosomes involved in CPM has not been evaluated previously in cases ascertained through spontaneous abortions (SAs). Therefore, it was impossible to determine if the relative lack of meiotic errors in trisomy-CPM cases was a characteristic of the specific chromosome involved or due simply to ascertainment through a mosaic state. In the present study, parental and meiotic/somatic stages of origin of trisomy were determined in 89 SAs involving trisomy of chromosomes 2, 4 to 10, 12, 15, 17, and 20. Comparisons were then made to origin of trisomy in cases of confined and generalized trisomy mosaicism. Although somatic errors are generally more common in mosaic cases, this depends on the specific chromosome involved. The results suggest that there are chromosome-specific differences in the relative frequency of somatic chromosome gain or loss and/or the ability of an early somatic loss of one chromosome from a trisomic conceptus to "rescue" the pregnancy. As mean maternal age was less in the somatic than meiotic origin cases (P < 0.01), the age distribution of the study population should also influence the probability of detecting a somatic error. No phenotypic differences were apparent when cases were subdivided based on either parent or stage of origin of the trisomy.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10213044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  7 in total

1.  Inducing segmental aneuploid mosaicism in the mouse through targeted asymmetric sister chromatid event of recombination.

Authors:  Arnaud Duchon; Vanessa Besson; Patricia Lopes Pereira; Laetitia Magnol; Yann Hérault
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The origin of abnormalities in recurrent aneuploidy/polyploidy.

Authors:  W P Robinson; D E McFadden; M D Stephenson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-10-23       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Mechanisms of mosaicism, chimerism and uniparental disomy identified by single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis.

Authors:  Laura K Conlin; Brian D Thiel; Carsten G Bonnemann; Livija Medne; Linda M Ernst; Elaine H Zackai; Matthew A Deardorff; Ian D Krantz; Hakon Hakonarson; Nancy B Spinner
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Full trisomy 5 in a sample of spontaneous abortion and Arias Stella reaction.

Authors:  Vida Čulić; Bernarda Lozic; Ivana Kuzmić-Prusac; Goran Mijaljica; Jasminka Pavelić
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-10

5.  Reduced recombination in maternal meiosis coupled with non-disjunction at meiosis II leading to recurrent 47,XXX.

Authors:  Orit Reish; Todd Berryman; Thomas R Cunningham; Carron Sher; William S Oetting
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.620

6.  Report of a new case with pentasomy X and novel clinical findings.

Authors:  O Demirhan; N Tanriverdi; M B Yilmaz; S Kocaturk-Sel; N Inandiklioglu; U Luleyap; E Akbal; G Comertpay; T Tufan; O Dur
Journal:  Balkan J Med Genet       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 0.519

7.  Clonal chromosomal and genomic instability during human multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells long-term culture.

Authors:  Victoria Nikitina; Tatiana Astrelina; Vladimir Nugis; Aleksandr Ostashkin; Tatiana Karaseva; Ekaterina Dobrovolskaya; Dariya Usupzhanova; Yulia Suchkova; Elena Lomonosova; Sergey Rodin; Vitaliy Brunchukov; Stanislav Lauk-Dubitskiy; Valentin Brumberg; Anastasia Machova; Irina Kobzeva; Andrey Bushmanov; Aleksandr Samoilov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.