OBJECTIVE: To assess the contribution of a questionnaire in the evaluation of patients operated for urinary stress incontinence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1988 to 1996, 42 patients underwent bladder neck suspension for urinary stress incontinence. Only 7 patients had no history of pelvic surgery, 24 patients presented pure urinary stress incontinence and 19 presented mixed incontinence, 37 patients were evaluable with a mean follow-up of 2 years. The evaluation consisted of two aspects: clinical assessment, based on review of the case files, showing that 77% of patients were continent, and a questionnaire (non-validated translation of "Q7" and "UD16"). This questionnaire evaluated quality of life (7 items) and symptoms. Each item was scored from 0 to 3. RESULTS: To interpret the results we divided the three main scores into three intervals, the first third corresponding to good results. The percentage of good results for the overall score, quality of life score and symptom score was 62%, 73% and 46% respectively. The most discriminative questions of the questionnaire can be used to analyse urine leaks related to effort, urgency episodes of incontinence. A score of 0 or 1 was considered to be a good result. The percentage of good results for these three questions was therefore 72%, 60% and 64%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The cure rate therefore varies as a function of the criteria selected: the questionnaire allows the urologist to more accurately assess the patient's postoperative state.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the contribution of a questionnaire in the evaluation of patients operated for urinary stress incontinence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1988 to 1996, 42 patients underwent bladder neck suspension for urinary stress incontinence. Only 7 patients had no history of pelvic surgery, 24 patients presented pure urinary stress incontinence and 19 presented mixed incontinence, 37 patients were evaluable with a mean follow-up of 2 years. The evaluation consisted of two aspects: clinical assessment, based on review of the case files, showing that 77% of patients were continent, and a questionnaire (non-validated translation of "Q7" and "UD16"). This questionnaire evaluated quality of life (7 items) and symptoms. Each item was scored from 0 to 3. RESULTS: To interpret the results we divided the three main scores into three intervals, the first third corresponding to good results. The percentage of good results for the overall score, quality of life score and symptom score was 62%, 73% and 46% respectively. The most discriminative questions of the questionnaire can be used to analyse urine leaks related to effort, urgency episodes of incontinence. A score of 0 or 1 was considered to be a good result. The percentage of good results for these three questions was therefore 72%, 60% and 64%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The cure rate therefore varies as a function of the criteria selected: the questionnaire allows the urologist to more accurately assess the patient's postoperative state.