Literature DB >> 10212921

A comparison of commercial and in-house ELISAs for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies directed against proteinase 3 and myeloperoxidase.

W Pollock1, K Dunster, J M Rolland, H Koh, J Savige.   

Abstract

This study compares the concordance of results in different ELISAs for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) directed against proteinase 3 (PR3) or myeloperoxidase (MPO). Sera were considered "true positives" if they were positive according to the manufacturer's criteria in a least three of the five PR3-ANCA ELISAs, or in at least four of the six MPO-ANCA ELISAs. Of the 26 sera that demonstrated cytoplasmic fluorescence (C-ANCA), 23 (89%) contained PR3-ANCA and three (11%) had MPO-ANCA. Two sera that were negative by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) contained PR3-ANCA. Of the 26 sera with perinuclear fluorescence (P-ANCA), 19 (73%) contained MPO-ANCA, and one (4%) had PR3-ANCA. Six sera with P-ANCA did not have PR3- or MPO-ANCA. No serum that was negative by IIF contained MPO-ANCA. For the different PR3-ANCA ELISAs, sensitivities ranged from 88 to 100%, and specificities from 91 to 100%. For the MPO-ANCA ELISAs, sensitivities varied from 59 to 100% and specificities from 83 to 100%. The highest sensitivity and specificity for both the PR3- and MPO-ANCA ELISAs were obtained with the IBL and Eurodiagnostica assays. The in-house PR3-ANCA ELISA performed slightly less well than the commercial assays, but the performance of the in-house MPO-ANCA assay was comparable or better.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10212921     DOI: 10.1080/003130299105511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathology        ISSN: 0031-3025            Impact factor:   5.306


  1 in total

1.  The binding of proteinase 3 antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (PR3-ANCA) varies in different ELISAs.

Authors:  M Trevisin; P Neeson; J Savige
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.