Literature DB >> 10212895

Neurotoxicity and artemisinin compounds do the observations in animals justify limitation of clinical use?

A D Dayan1.   

Abstract

High parenteral doses of certain artemisinin derivatives can produce a limited and unique, selective brain stem neuronopathy in laboratory animals. There is necrosis of a small number of nerve cells in certain brain stem nuclei and more extensive chromatolysis of neurons in the same nuclei a few days after intramuscular or intravenous injection of dihydroqinghaosu, artemether and arteether in doses exceeding about 6mg/kg/d intramuscular or intravenous for about 3-5 days (in an oily solvent) in the dog, or after a single parenteral dose exceeding about 100 mg/kg. The limited information available about the monkey suggests that it is only affected after doses several times higher. The probable order of sensitivity of species is dog > rat > monkey, but this is based on only few results. No lesions have been reported after various intramuscular and oral dosages of artesunate and artelinate. The limited reports of clinical observations have not suggested any specific pattern of abnormalities. The lesion is unique in its distribution, in the small number of neurons that become necrotic and the occurrence in nearby cells of chromatolysis. The latter is almost certainly reversible because more prolonged or higher dose studies have not shown more extensive neuronal damage. As the pathogenesis of this toxic response is not known, evaluation of the risk to man must be based on conventional assessment of active doses in animals versus those employed in the treatment of cerebral malaria. It is argued that there is no reason to anticipate a particular risk of conventional regimes employing up to artemether 3-6mg/kg/d intramuscular or other regimes involving artesunate per rectum for a few days.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10212895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Trop (Mars)        ISSN: 0025-682X


  7 in total

Review 1.  Peroxisome proliferator activating receptor (PPAR) in cerebral malaria (CM): a novel target for an additional therapy.

Authors:  S Balachandar; A Katyal
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Cerebral malaria: optimising management.

Authors:  Neema Mturi; Crispin O Musumba; Betty M Wamola; Bernhards R Ogutu; Charles R J C Newton
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 3.  Antimalarial drug toxicity: a review.

Authors:  W Robert J Taylor; Nicholas J White
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Selection and reversal of Plasmodium berghei resistance in the mouse model following repeated high doses of artemether.

Authors:  Shu-Hua Xiao; Jun-Min Yao; Jürg Utzinger; Yue Cai; Jacques Chollet; Marcel Tanner
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2003-12-16       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Penetration of dihydroartemisinin into cerebrospinal fluid after administration of intravenous artesunate in severe falciparum malaria.

Authors:  Timothy M E Davis; Tran Quang Binh; Kenneth F Ilett; Kevin T Batty; Hoang Lan Phuöng; Gregory M Chiswell; Vu Duong Bich Phuong; Cindy Agus
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Molecular Farming in Artemisia annua, a Promising Approach to Improve Anti-malarial Drug Production.

Authors:  Giuseppe Pulice; Soraya Pelaz; Luis Matías-Hernández
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 7.  Dihydroartemisinin: A Potential Natural Anticancer Drug.

Authors:  Xiaoshuo Dai; Xiaoyan Zhang; Wei Chen; Yihuan Chen; Qiushuang Zhang; Saijun Mo; Jing Lu
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 6.580

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.