Literature DB >> 10212536

Surgical-prosthodontic reconstruction of advanced maxillary bone compromise with autogenous onlay block bone grafts and osseointegrated endosseous implants: a 12-year study of 32 consecutive patients.

E E Keller1, D E Tolman, S Eckert.   

Abstract

During a 12-year period (1984 to 1997), 32 consecutive patients with advanced maxillary bone compromise received surgical-prosthodontic rehabilitation. The most frequent procedure used was maxillary augmentation with a free nonvascularized autogenous onlay block bone graft, and the average time of prosthesis function was 67 months. Twenty-eight patients underwent a 1-stage procedure, in which endosseous implants were placed simultaneously for internal rigid skeletal fixation of the onlay bone graft, and 4 patients underwent a 2-stage procedure, in which endosseous implants were placed secondarily 6 months after complete healing of the previously placed onlay bone graft, which initially was stabilized by titanium miniplates and lag screws. Treatment success was evaluated separately for the first 7 consecutively treated patients (developmental group) and for the next 25 consecutive patients (routine group). Assessment was made of implant survival relative to etiology of bone loss, implant type and length, type of prosthesis, type of opposing occlusion, type of surgical procedure, and presence of discontinuity. The implant survival rate was 91% in the 25 routine patients and 65% in the 7 developmental patients. Implant type and length, prosthesis type, opposing occlusion, and the presence or absence of discontinuity significantly impacted treatment outcome. Onlay block bone graft success (96%) in all 32 treated patients and prosthetic success (96%) in the last 25 patients was recorded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10212536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  14 in total

1.  [Combined sinus lift procedure and lateral augmentation. A treatment concept for the surgical and prosthodontic rehabilitation of the extremely atrophic maxilla].

Authors:  D Weingart; R Bublitz; G Petrin; J Kälber; S Ingimarsson
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2005-09

Review 2.  Bone augmentation with TiMesh. autologous bone versus autologous bone and bone substitutes. A systematic review.

Authors:  Fabrizio Carini; Salvatore Longoni; Ernesto Amosso; Jacopo Paleari; Stefania Carini; Gianluca Porcaro
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-10-25

3.  Survival of conventional dental implants in the edentulous atrophic maxilla in combination with zygomatic implants: a 20-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Luc Vrielinck; Jorden Blok; Constantinus Politis
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-06-15

4.  Restoration-guided implant rehabilitation of the complex partial edentulism: a clinical report.

Authors:  Fotios Tzerbos; Nikitas Sykaras; Vasilios Tzoras
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2010-04-01

5.  Tentpole technique for bone regeneration in vertically deficient alveolar ridges: A prospective study.

Authors:  Dipti Daga; Divya Mehrotra; Shadab Mohammad; Shaleen Chandra; Geeta Singh; Divya Mehrotra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-11-24

6.  Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Brånemark Implants with an Anodized Surface following Seven-to-Eight Years of Functional Loading.

Authors:  David Gelb; Bradley McAllister; Pirkka Nummikoski; Massimo Del Fabbro
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2013-03-07

7.  A comparison study between periosteum and resorbable collagen membrane on iliac block bone graft resorption in the rabbit calvarium.

Authors:  Ji-Woong Yang; Hong-Ju Park; Kil-Hwa Yoo; Kwang Chung; Seunggon Jung; Hee-Kyun Oh; Hyung-Seok Kim; Min-Suk Kook
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 8.  Long-term effects of vertical bone augmentation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Johan Anton Jochum Keestra; Obada Barry; Lianne de Jong; Gerhard Wahl
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Volumetric stability of autogenous bone graft with mandibular body bone: cone-beam computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstruction analysis.

Authors:  Hyeong-Geun Lee; Yong-Deok Kim
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-10-20

Review 10.  Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Saeed Reza Motamedian; Moein Khojaste; Arash Khojasteh
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.