Literature DB >> 10212535

The early remodeling phases around titanium implants: a histomorphometric assessment of bone quality in a 3- and 6-month study in sheep.

D Chappard1, E Aguado, G Huré, F Grizon, M F Basle.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of the bone matrix around commercially pure titanium implants at 3 and 6 months postplacement in sheep. Implants were placed in the corticotrabecular areas of both femurs in 6 animals. Each animal received 4 Euroteknika implants in the right femur and 4 Nobel Biocare implants in the left femur. Bone blocks containing the implants were studied undecalcified after being embedded in methylmethacrylate. Sections were stained with toluidine blue and basic fuchsin. The amount of bone around the implants, the contact interface between the implant and bone, and the mineral apposition rates were measured. The fractional amount of woven bone could be quantified because of its high glycosaminoglycan content. No differences could be observed between the 2 types of implants. Total bone volume did not increase around both types of implants between 3 and 6 months, indicating that ankylosis was rapidly achieved. In contrast, in the area in contact with the implant, the bone-titanium interface drastically increased and the mineral apposition rate decreased. The fractional volume of woven bone around implants was considerably reduced after 6 months. Bone quality around implants was improved at 6 months (volume of woven bone near zero), and true osteonic structures were observed in close contact with titanium. The remodeling process appeared to improve bone quality and increase the bone-titanium interface around implants, while the net bone quantity necessary to immobilize implants was achieved rapidly and remained unchanged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10212535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  11 in total

1.  [Chemically modified, ultra-hydrophilic titanium implant surfaces].

Authors:  Frank Schwarz; Monika Herten; Marco Wieland; Michel Dard; Jürgen Becker
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-01

2.  Osseointegration improves bone-implant interface of pedicle screws in the growing spine: a biomechanical and histological study using an in vivo immature porcine model.

Authors:  Kanako Shiba; Hiroshi Taneichi; Takashi Namikawa; Satoshi Inami; Daisaku Takeuchi; Yutaka Nohara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  In vivo preclinical evaluation of the influence of osteoporosis on the anchorage of different pedicle screw designs.

Authors:  Gianluca Giavaresi; Milena Fini; Roberto Giardino; Francesca Salamanna; Maria Sartori; Veronica Borsari; Silvia Spriano; Chiara M Bellini; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Osseointegration and biocompatibility of different metal implants--a comparative experimental investigation in sheep.

Authors:  Michael Plecko; Christine Sievert; Daniel Andermatt; Robert Frigg; Peter Kronen; Karina Klein; Stefan Stübinger; Katja Nuss; Alexander Bürki; Stephen Ferguson; Ulrich Stoeckle; Brigitte von Rechenberg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Osseointegration of porous titanium implants with and without electrochemically deposited DCPD coating in an ovine model.

Authors:  Dong Chen; Nicky Bertollo; Abe Lau; Naoya Taki; Tomofumi Nishino; Hajime Mishima; Haruo Kawamura; William R Walsh
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Bone apposition to titanium implants biocoated with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2). A pilot study in dogs.

Authors:  Jürgen Becker; Axel Kirsch; Frank Schwarz; Maria Chatzinikolaidou; Daniel Rothamel; Vojislav Lekovic; Markus Laub; Herbert Peter Jennissen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  A comparative study to evaluate the osteoblastic cell behavior of two nano coated titanium surfaces with NAFION stabilized the membrane.

Authors:  Sanjna Nayar; Sanket Chakraverty
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

8.  One-Piece Zirconia Ceramic versus Titanium Implants in the Jaw and Femur of a Sheep Model: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  A Siddiqi; W J Duncan; R K De Silva; S Zafar
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  The Effect of Implant Length and Diameter on Stress Distribution around Single Implant Placement in 3D Posterior Mandibular FE Model Directly Constructed Form In Vivo CT.

Authors:  Akikazu Shinya; Yoshiki Ishida; Daisuke Miura; Akiyoshi Shinya
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Microarchitecture of titanium cylinders obtained by additive manufacturing does not influence osseointegration in the sheep.

Authors:  Louis Rony; Eric Aguado; Bruno Verlee; Florence Pascaretti-Grizon; Daniel Chappard
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2021-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.