Literature DB >> 10211991

Analysis of chromosome aneuploidy in breast carcinoma progression by using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

J Mendelin1, M Grayson, T Wallis, D W Visscher.   

Abstract

Nonisotopic fluorescence in situ hybridization by using alpha satellite centromeric probes was performed on intact tissue sections of 12 breast carcinomas to compare the pattern of aneuploidy for chromosomes 7, 8, 16, and 17 between foci of residual in situ carcinoma (DCIS) and a representative area of coexisting invasive neoplasm. Most hybridization pairs (58%) showed a gain in chromosomal copy number between the in situ and corresponding invasive area, whereas 29% showed no apparent change and 13% showed loss in copy number. Hybridizations from areas of invasive carcinoma, thus, were more frequently characterized by tumor cells with trisomy/polysomy (78%) than neoplastic cells from residual DCIS (50%) and less frequently characterized by cells with monosomy (10% versus 16%, p = 0.01). Even when DCIS cells exhibited chromosome trisomy, 65% of hybridizations demonstrated a significantly greater proportion of trisomic cells in the corresponding invasive population. The hybridization pairs (n = 7) initially showing apparent loss in chromosome copy number from in situ to invasive growth were all from two cases that demonstrated morphologic heterogeneity. Enumeration of cells from histologically distinct areas of these cases revealed different patterns of aneusomy, in keeping with karyotypic diversity. However, comparison of histologically similar areas of DCIS and invasive neoplasm demonstrated a pattern of chromosome copy gain with invasive growth, similar to morphologically homogeneous tumors. We conclude that invading cells in breast carcinomas differ from residual in situ populations with respect to degree of chromosome aneuploidy and that tumor progression from preinvasive to an invasive phenotype in human breast carcinoma is characterized by a significant increase in the degree of genetic instability. The observed pattern of chromosome copy number gain, moreover, is consistent with a common cellular level genetic mechanism underlying early breast tumor progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10211991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Invest        ISSN: 0023-6837            Impact factor:   5.662


  10 in total

1.  Monosomy of chromosome 8 could be considered as a primary preneoplastic event in breast cancer: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Fabiola A García Parra-Pérez; Angel Zavala-Pompa; Javier Pacheco-Calleros; Elva I Cortés-Gutiérrez; Ricardo M Cerda-Flores; Sandra Lara-Miranda; Martha I Dávila-Rodríguez
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Evaluation of associations between common variation in mitotic regulatory pathways and risk of overall and high grade breast cancer.

Authors:  Kristen N Stevens; Xianshu Wang; Zachary Fredericksen; V Shane Pankratz; James Cerhan; Celine M Vachon; Janet E Olson; Fergus J Couch
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Genome-based versus gene-based theory of cancer: possible implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Natasa Todorovic-Rakovic
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 4.  Centrosome amplification and the origin of chromosomal instability in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Salisbury; Antonino B D'Assoro; Wilma L Lingle
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.673

5.  Centrosome amplification drives chromosomal instability in breast tumor development.

Authors:  Wilma L Lingle; Susan L Barrett; Vivian C Negron; Antonino B D'Assoro; Kelly Boeneman; Wanguo Liu; Clark M Whitehead; Carol Reynolds; Jeffrey L Salisbury
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A modified approach for I-FISH evaluation of ERBB2 (HER-2) gene copy numbers in breast carcinomas: comparison with HER-2/CEP17 ratio system.

Authors:  Marcela Mrhalova; Roman Kodet
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  The relationship between the presence of chromosomal instability and prognosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of paraffin-embedded tissue from 47 Korean patients.

Authors:  Jung-Wan Yoo; Kwang Won Seo; Se Jin Jang; Yeon-Mock Oh; Tae Sun Shim; Woo Sung Kim; Dong-Soon Lee; Sang-Do Lee; Chang-Min Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 8.  Breast cancer and aneusomy 17: implications for carcinogenesis and therapeutic response.

Authors:  Monica M Reinholz; Amy K Bruzek; Daniel W Visscher; Wilma L Lingle; Matthew J Schroeder; Edith A Perez; Robert B Jenkins
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Genetic variation in mitotic regulatory pathway genes is associated with breast tumor grade.

Authors:  Kristen S Purrington; Seth Slettedahl; Manjeet K Bolla; Kyriaki Michailidou; Kamila Czene; Heli Nevanlinna; Stig E Bojesen; Irene L Andrulis; Angela Cox; Per Hall; Jane Carpenter; Drakoulis Yannoukakos; Christopher A Haiman; Peter A Fasching; Arto Mannermaa; Robert Winqvist; Hermann Brenner; Annika Lindblom; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Javier Benitez; Anthony Swerdlow; Vessela Kristensen; Pascal Guénel; Alfons Meindl; Hatef Darabi; Mikael Eriksson; Rainer Fagerholm; Kristiina Aittomäki; Carl Blomqvist; Børge G Nordestgaard; Sune F Nielsen; Henrik Flyger; Xianshu Wang; Curtis Olswold; Janet E Olson; Anna Marie Mulligan; Julia A Knight; Sandrine Tchatchou; Malcolm W R Reed; Simon S Cross; Jianjun Liu; Jingmei Li; Keith Humphreys; Christine Clarke; Rodney Scott; Florentia Fostira; George Fountzilas; Irene Konstantopoulou; Brian E Henderson; Fredrick Schumacher; Loic Le Marchand; Arif B Ekici; Arndt Hartmann; Matthias W Beckmann; Jaana M Hartikainen; Veli-Matti Kosma; Vesa Kataja; Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen; Katri Pylkäs; Saila Kauppila; Aida Karina Dieffenbach; Christa Stegmaier; Volker Arndt; Sara Margolin; Rosemary Balleine; Jose Ignacio Arias Perez; M Pilar Zamora; Primitiva Menéndez; Alan Ashworth; Michael Jones; Nick Orr; Patrick Arveux; Pierre Kerbrat; Thérèse Truong; Peter Bugert; Amanda E Toland; Christine B Ambrosone; France Labrèche; Mark S Goldberg; Martine Dumont; Argyrios Ziogas; Eunjung Lee; Gillian S Dite; Carmel Apicella; Melissa C Southey; Jirong Long; Martha Shrubsole; Sandra Deming-Halverson; Filomena Ficarazzi; Monica Barile; Paolo Peterlongo; Katarzyna Durda; Katarzyna Jaworska-Bieniek; Robert A E M Tollenaar; Caroline Seynaeve; Thomas Brüning; Yon-Dschun Ko; Carolien H M Van Deurzen; John W M Martens; Mieke Kriege; Jonine D Figueroa; Stephen J Chanock; Jolanta Lissowska; Ian Tomlinson; Michael J Kerin; Nicola Miller; Andreas Schneeweiss; William J Tapper; Susan M Gerty; Lorraine Durcan; Catriona Mclean; Roger L Milne; Laura Baglietto; Isabel dos Santos Silva; Olivia Fletcher; Nichola Johnson; Laura J Van'T Veer; Sten Cornelissen; Asta Försti; Diana Torres; Thomas Rüdiger; Anja Rudolph; Dieter Flesch-Janys; Stefan Nickels; Caroline Weltens; Giuseppe Floris; Matthieu Moisse; Joe Dennis; Qin Wang; Alison M Dunning; Mitul Shah; Judith Brown; Jacques Simard; Hoda Anton-Culver; Susan L Neuhausen; John L Hopper; Natalia Bogdanova; Thilo Dörk; Wei Zheng; Paolo Radice; Anna Jakubowska; Jan Lubinski; Peter Devillee; Hiltrud Brauch; Maartje Hooning; Montserrat García-Closas; Elinor Sawyer; Barbara Burwinkel; Frederick Marmee; Diana M Eccles; Graham G Giles; Julian Peto; Marjanka Schmidt; Annegien Broeks; Ute Hamann; Jenny Chang-Claude; Diether Lambrechts; Paul D P Pharoah; Douglas Easton; V Shane Pankratz; Susan Slager; Celine M Vachon; Fergus J Couch
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  A role for polyploidy in the tumorigenicity of Pim-1-expressing human prostate and mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  Meejeon Roh; Omar E Franco; Simon W Hayward; Riet van der Meer; Sarki A Abdulkadir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.