Literature DB >> 10211832

Specificity of coenzyme analogues and fragments in promoting or impeding the refolding of clostridial glutamate dehydrogenase.

S Aghajanian1, T P Walsh, P C Engel.   

Abstract

NAD+ facilitates high-yield reactivation of clostridial glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) after unfolding in urea. The specificity of this effect has been explored by using analogues and fragments of NAD+. The adenine portion, unlike the nicotinamide portion, is important for reactivation. Alteration in the nicotinamide portion, in acetylpyridine adenine dinucleotide, has little effect, whereas loss of the 6-NH2 substitution on the adenine ring, in 6-deamino NAD, diminishes the effectiveness of the nucleotide in promoting refolding. Also ADP-ribose, lacking nicotinamide, promotes reactivation whereas NMN-phosphoribose, lacking the adenine, does not. Of the smaller fragments, those containing an adenosine moiety, and especially those with one or more phosphate groups, impede the refolding ability of NAD+, and are able to bind to the folding intermediate though unable to facilitate refolding. These results are interpreted in terms of the known 3D structure for clostridial glutamate dehydrogenase. It is assumed that the refolding intermediate has a more or less fully formed NAD+-binding domain but a partially disordered substrate-binding domain and linking region. Binding of NAD+ or ADP-ribose appears to impose new structural constraints that result in completion of the correct folding of the second domain, allowing association of enzyme molecules to form the native hexamer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10211832      PMCID: PMC2144299          DOI: 10.1110/ps.8.4.866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  16 in total

Review 1.  Bovine liver glutamate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  H Eisenberg; R Josephs; E Reisler
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  1976

2.  Re-activation of Clostridium symbiosum glutamate dehydrogenase from subunits denatured by urea.

Authors:  S Aghajanian; P C Engel
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  The chaperonin from the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus promotes correct refolding and prevents thermal denaturation in vitro.

Authors:  A Guagliardi; L Cerchia; S Bartolucci; M Rossi
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Studies of dissociation-association processes in clostridial glutamate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  S A Aghajanian; P C Engel
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.407

5.  Refolding of glutamate dehydrogenase from Bacillus acidocaldarius after guanidinium chloride-induced unfolding.

Authors:  V Consalvi; S Millevoi; R Chiaraluce; M de Rosa; R Scandurra
Journal:  Biochem Mol Biol Int       Date:  1995-02

6.  Subunit assembly and active site location in the structure of glutamate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  P J Baker; K L Britton; P C Engel; G W Farrants; K S Lilley; D W Rice; T J Stillman
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1992-01

7.  Functional studies of a glutamate dehydrogenase with known three-dimensional structure: steady-state kinetics of the forward and reverse reactions catalysed by the NAD(+)-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase of Clostridium symbiosum.

Authors:  S E Syed; P C Engel; D M Parker
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1991-12-06

8.  Structural consequences of sequence patterns in the fingerprint region of the nucleotide binding fold. Implications for nucleotide specificity.

Authors:  P J Baker; K L Britton; D W Rice; A Rob; T J Stillman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1992-11-20       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  The unfolding and refolding of glutamate dehydrogenases from bovine liver, baker's yeast and Clostridium symbosium.

Authors:  S M West; N C Price
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1988-04-01       Impact factor: 3.857

10.  Conformational flexibility in glutamate dehydrogenase. Role of water in substrate recognition and catalysis.

Authors:  T J Stillman; P J Baker; K L Britton; D W Rice
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-12-20       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.