Literature DB >> 10211714

Bioequivalence of ivermectin formulations in pigs and cattle.

A Lifschitz1, A Pis, L Alvarez, G Virkel, S Sanchez, J Sallovitz, R Kujanek, C Lanusse.   

Abstract

The vehicle in which endectocide compounds are formulated plays a relevant role in their absorption kinetics and resultant systemic availability. The pharmaceutical bioequivalence and comparative plasma disposition kinetics of ivermectin (IVM), following the subcutaneous administration of two injectable formulations to pigs and cattle were investigated using parallel experimental designs. Sixteen parasite-free male Duroc Jersey-Yorkshire crossbred pigs (90-110 kg) (Expt 1) and 16 parasite-free male Holstein calves (100-120 kg) (Expt 2) were divided into two groups and treated subcutaneously at either 300 (pigs) or 200 (calves) microg/kg with two different propylene glycol/glycerol formal (60: 40) based IVM formulations; in both experiments pigs or calves in Group A received the test (IVM-TEST) formulation and those in Group B were treated with the reference formulation (IVM-CONTROL). Heparinized blood samples were taken from 0 h up to either 20 (pigs) or 30 (calves) days post-treatment and plasma was extracted, derivatized and analysed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using fluorescence detection. Early detection of IVM (12 h) with a peak plasma concentration (C(max)) between 33 and 39 ng/mL was observed in pigs. The drug was detected in plasma up to 20 days post-administration of either formulation, resulting in elimination half-lives between 3.47 and 3.80 days. There were no differences between the IVM-TEST and IVM-CONTROL formulations in the kinetic parameters (except t(max)) obtained in pigs. IVM was detected in plasma between 12 h and 30 days post-administration of both formulations under investigation in cattle. The plasma disposition kinetics of IVM in calves was similar following treatment with both formulations. C(max) values (between 40.5 and 46.4 ng/mL) were achieved at 2 days post-administration of both formulations. None of the estimated kinetic parameters were statistically different between drug formulations. The injectable IVM formulations investigated were bioequivalent after their subcutaneous administration to both pigs and calves at recommended dose rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10211714     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2885.1999.00172.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0140-7783            Impact factor:   1.786


  8 in total

Review 1.  Factors influencing the use and interpretation of animal models in the development of parenteral drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Marilyn N Martinez
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Ivermectin in senegalese peulh sheep: influence of sex on plasma disposition.

Authors:  T Bengone Ndong; Y Kane; E H M Diouf; M Alvinerie
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2007-01-27       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Eprinomectin in dairy zebu Gobra cattle (Bos indicus): plasma kinetics and excretion in milk.

Authors:  T Bengone-Ndong; M A Ba; Y Kane; I Sané; J F Sutra; M Alvinerie
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  Pilot Study of a Slow-Release Ivermectin Formulation for Malaria Control in a Pig Model.

Authors:  Carlos Chaccour; Gloria Abizanda; Ángel Irigoyen; José Luis Del Pozo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  A comparative kinetic study of doramectin and moxidectin in zebu Gobra cattle (Bos indicus).

Authors:  T Bengone-Ndong; S Kiki Mvouaka; Y Kane; W A Loudy-Moukédé; L J Panguy; M Alvinerie
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 6.  Broadening the range of use cases for ivermectin - a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Christian Kositz; John Bradley; Harry Hutchins; Anna Last; Umberto D'Alessandro; Michael Marks
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.455

7.  A controlled study on gastrointestinal nematodes from two Swedish cattle farms showing field evidence of ivermectin resistance.

Authors:  Marlene Areskog; Sofia Sollenberg; Annie Engström; Georg von Samson-Himmelstjerna; Johan Höglund
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  Cytochrome P450/ABC transporter inhibition simultaneously enhances ivermectin pharmacokinetics in the mammal host and pharmacodynamics in Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Carlos J Chaccour; Felix Hammann; Marta Alustiza; Sandra Castejon; Brian B Tarimo; Gloria Abizanda; Ángel Irigoyen Barrio; Helena Martí Soler; Rafael Moncada; José Ignacio Bilbao; Azucena Aldaz; Marta Maia; José Luis Del Pozo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.