Literature DB >> 10211240

Assessment in general practice: the predictive value of written-knowledge tests and a multiple-station examination for actual medical performance in daily practice.

P Ram1, C van der Vleuten, J J Rethans, B Schouten, S Hobma, R Grol.   

Abstract

This study compares the predictive values of written-knowledge tests and a standardized multiple-station examination for the actual medical performance of general practitioners (GPs) in order to select effective assessment methods to be used in quality-improvement activities. A comprehensive assessment was performed in four phases. First, 100 GPs from the southern part of the Netherlands were assessed by a general medical knowledge test and by a knowledge test on technical skills. Second, in order to check for time-order effects, participants were randomly divided into two groups of 50 each, comparable on scores of both knowledge tests and on professional characteristics. Finally, both groups went through a multiple station examination using standardized patients and a practice video assessment of real surgery, but in opposite orders. Consultations were videotaped and assessed by well-trained peer observers. The drop-out rate was 10%. In both groups the predictive value of medical knowledge tests, ranging from 0.43 to 0.56 (Pearson correlation disattenuated), proved to be comparable with the predictive value of the multiple-station examination for actual performance (0.33-0.59). The overall explained variance of scores of the practice video assessment, measured by multiple regression analysis with performance scores as dependent variables and scores on the knowledge tests and the multiple-station examination as independent variables was moderate (19%). A time-order effect showed in only one direction: from practice video assessment to the multiple-station examination. The GP's professional characteristics did not contribute to the explanation of variation in performance. Medical knowledge tests can predict actual clinical performance to the same extent as a multiple-station examination. Compared with a station examination, a knowledge test may be a good alternative method for assessment the procedures of a large number of practising GPs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10211240     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00280.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  9 in total

1.  Part 12: Education, implementation, and teams: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Mary E Mancini; Farhan Bhanji; John E Billi; Jennifer Dennett; Judith Finn; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma; Gavin D Perkins; David L Rodgers; Mary Fran Hazinski; Ian Jacobs; Peter T Morley
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  Evaluation of a Biomedical Informatics course for medical students: a pre-posttest study at UNAM Faculty of Medicine in Mexico.

Authors:  Melchor Sánchez-Mendiola; Adrián I Martínez-Franco; Marlette Lobato-Valverde; Fabián Fernández-Saldívar; Tania Vives-Varela; Adrián Martínez-González
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Assessing the assessment in emergency care training.

Authors:  Mary E W Dankbaar; Karen M Stegers-Jager; Frank Baarveld; Jeroen J G van Merrienboer; Geoff R Norman; Frans L Rutten; Jan L C M van Saase; Stephanie C E Schuit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The evaluation of a composed program of continuing medical education for general practitioners.

Authors:  Marzieh Moattari; Davood Yadgari; Seyed Jalil Hoseini
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2014-07

5.  Predicting medical graduates' clinical performance using national competency examination results in Indonesia.

Authors:  Prattama Santoso Utomo; Amandha Boy Timor Randita; Rilani Riskiyana; Felicia Kurniawan; Irwin Aras; Cholis Abrori; Gandes Retno Rahayu
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 6.  The hypertension management program: identifying opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  Susan K Maue; James H Jackson; Bruce A Weiss; Marc L Rivo; Vishu Jhaveri; Barbara Lennert
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  'In situ simulation' versus 'off site simulation' in obstetric emergencies and their effect on knowledge, safety attitudes, team performance, stress, and motivation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jette Led Sørensen; Cees Van der Vleuten; Jane Lindschou; Christian Gluud; Doris Østergaard; Vicki LeBlanc; Marianne Johansen; Kim Ekelund; Charlotte Krebs Albrechtsen; Berit Woetman Pedersen; Hanne Kjærgaard; Pia Weikop; Bent Ottesen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Simulation-based multiprofessional obstetric anaesthesia training conducted in situ versus off-site leads to similar individual and team outcomes: a randomised educational trial.

Authors:  Jette Led Sørensen; Cees van der Vleuten; Susanne Rosthøj; Doris Østergaard; Vicki LeBlanc; Marianne Johansen; Kim Ekelund; Liis Starkopf; Jane Lindschou; Christian Gluud; Pia Weikop; Bent Ottesen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Assessment of Competence in Emergency Medicine among Healthcare Professionals in Cameroon.

Authors:  Sang Chul Kim; Young Sun Ro; Sang Do Shin; Dae Han Wi; Joongsik Jeong; Ju Ok Park; Kyong Min Sun; Kwangsoo Bae
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.153

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.