Literature DB >> 10211016

Epidural pain relief in labour: potencies of levobupivacaine and racemic bupivacaine.

G Lyons1, M Columb, R C Wilson, R V Johnson.   

Abstract

We have compared the minimum local analgesic concentrations (MLAC) of levobupivacaine relative to racemic bupivacaine in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, sequential allocation study. Women in labour were given a 20-ml bolus of epidural levobupivacaine or bupivacaine diluted to a concentration determined by up-down sequential allocation. The initial concentration was 0.07% w/v for both drugs. Efficacy was defined using a visual analogue pain score (VAPS) at 10 mm or less within 30 min. The MLAC of levobupivacaine was 0.083% w/v (95% CI 0.065-0.101) and the MLAC of bupivacaine 0.081% w/v (95% CI 0.055-0.108). In molar terms, the MLAC of levobupivacaine was 2.87 mmol litre-1 (95% CI 2.25-3.49) and the MLAC of bupivacaine 2.49 mmol litre-1 (95% CI 1.69-3.32). With regard to the commercial preparations, the potency ratio levobupivacaine: bupivacaine was 0.98 (95% CI 0.67-1.41), and this is unlikely to be of clinical relevance. In molar terms, the ratio was 0.87 (95% CI 0.60-1.25). With regard to toxicity, the evidence should be evaluated in the light of a possible 13% potency difference in molar concentration in favour of racemic bupivacaine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10211016     DOI: 10.1093/bja/81.6.899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  21 in total

Review 1.  [Levobupivacaine for regional anesthesia. A systematic review].

Authors:  B Urbanek; S Kapral
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Direct cardiac effects of intracoronary bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in the sheep.

Authors:  D H Chang; L A Ladd; S Copeland; M A Iglesias; J L Plummer; L E Mather
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Levobupivacaine: a review of its pharmacology and use as a local anaesthetic.

Authors:  R H Foster; A Markham
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Neuraxial drug administration: a review of treatment options for anaesthesia and analgesia.

Authors:  Stephan A Schug; David Saunders; Irina Kurowski; Michael J Paech
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 5.  Levobupivacaine: a review of its use in regional anaesthesia and pain management.

Authors:  Mark Sanford; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Cardiotoxicity with modern local anaesthetics: is there a safer choice?

Authors:  L E Mather; D H Chang
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Anesthetic efficacy of bupivacaine solutions in inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Volpato; José Ranali; Juliana Cama Ramacciato; Patrícia Cristine de Oliveira; Glaúcia Maria Bovi Ambrosano; Francisco Carlos Groppo
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2005

8.  Progress in analgesia for labor: focus on neuraxial blocks.

Authors:  J Sudharma Ranasinghe; David J Birnbach
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

9.  Levobupivacaine for epidural anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia in hip surgery: a multi-center efficacy and safety equivalence study with bupivacaine and ropivacaine.

Authors:  T Koch; A Fichtner; U Schwemmer; T Standl; T Volk; K Engelhard; M F Stevens; C Putzke; J Scholz; M Zenz; J Motsch; V Hempel; A Heinrichs; B Zwissler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 10.  [Levobupivacaine in obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia. Where is its place?].

Authors:  D H Bremerich; B Zwissler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.