Literature DB >> 10210027

Phenytoin pharmacokinetics following oral administration of phenytoin suspension and fosphenytoin solution to rats.

A H Burstein1, D S Cox, B Mistry, N D Eddington.   

Abstract

The administration of phenytoin suspension in conjunction with enteral nutrition supplements through nasogastric (NG) feeding tubes to humans has been associated with suboptimal phenytoin absorption, subtherapeutic concentrations, and breakthrough seizures. Postulated mechanisms include chelation to proteins and electrolytes in the enteral feeding, binding to NG tubing, and alterations in gastrointestinal pH resulting in precipitation of phenytoin. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the oral absorption of commercially available fosphenytoin injectable solution compared to phenytoin suspension in the rat to determine whether equivalent oral fosphenytoin and phenytoin suspension doses should be used for future human studies of fosphenytoin oral absorption in the presence of concomitant enteral nutrition. A single oral 30 mg/kg phenytoin equivalents dose of either commercially available fosphenytoin or phenytoin suspension was administered to male Wistar rats following an overnight fast. Blood samples (0.3 ml) for phenytoin plasma concentration were obtained from a jugular vein catheter at baseline and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12 and 24 h post-study drug administration and analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (CV% < 6). Mean phenytoin Cmax was 85% [corrected] (P = 0.010) higher in fosphenytoin vs phenytoin treated rats. Tmax was 2.4 h (62%, P=0.021) shorter in fosphenytoin vs phenytoin treated rats. No significant differences in AUClast were found. The presence of a phosphate ester moiety does not appear to inhibit the appearance of phenytoin following oral administration of fosphenytoin. Phenytoin plasma concentration profiles following oral administration of fosphenytoin are characterized by higher Cmax and shorter Tmax values relative to oral administration of phenytoin suspension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10210027     DOI: 10.1016/s0920-1211(98)00107-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Res        ISSN: 0920-1211            Impact factor:   3.045


  3 in total

1.  Absorption rate limit considerations for oral phosphate prodrugs.

Authors:  Tycho Heimbach; Doo-Man Oh; Lilian Y Li; Markus Forsberg; Jouko Savolainen; Jukka Leppänen; Yasushi Matsunaga; Gordon Flynn; David Fleisher
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Incorporation of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in the evaluation of solubility requirements for the salt selection process: a case study using phenytoin.

Authors:  Po-Chang Chiang; Harvey Wong
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  High-Throughput Excipient Discovery Enables Oral Delivery of Poorly Soluble Pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Ting; Swapnil Tale; Anatolii A Purchel; Seamus D Jones; Lakmini Widanapathirana; Zachary P Tolstyka; Li Guo; Steven J Guillaudeu; Frank S Bates; Theresa M Reineke
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 14.553

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.