Literature DB >> 10209012

Trends in antihypertensive drug advertising, 1985-1996.

T J Wang1, J C Ausiello, R S Stafford.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and ACE inhibitors have been used increasingly in the treatment of hypertension. In contrast, beta-blocker and diuretic use has decreased. It has been suggested that pharmaceutical marketing has influenced these prescribing patterns. No objective analysis of advertising for antihypertensive therapies exists, however. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We reviewed the January, April, July, and October issues of the New England Journal of Medicine from 1985 to 1996 (210 issues). The intensity of drug promotion was measured as the proportion of advertising pages used to promote a given medication. Statistical analyses used the chi2 test for trend. Advertising for CCBs increased from 4.6% of advertising pages in 1985 to 26.9% in 1996, while advertising for beta-blockers (12.4% in 1985 to 0% in 1996) and diuretics (4.2% to 0%) decreased (all P<0.0001). A nonsignificant increase was observed in advertising for ACE inhibitors (3.5% to 4.3%, P=0.17). Although the total number of drug advertising pages per issue decreased from 60 pages in 1985 to 42 pages in 1996 (P<0.001), the number of pages devoted to calcium channel blocker advertisements nearly quadrupled.
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing promotion of CCBs has mirrored trends in physician prescribing. An association between advertising and prescribing patterns could explain why CCBs have supplanted better-substantiated therapies for hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10209012     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.99.15.2055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  20 in total

1.  Selling drugs to the public--should the UK follow the example of the US?

Authors:  John Frey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Selling drugs to doctors--it's marketing, not education.

Authors:  Richelle Cooper; Jerome Hoffman
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Conflicts between commercial and scientific interests in pharmaceutical advertising for medical journals.

Authors:  Alexander C Tsai
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.663

4.  Difference of antihypertensive prescribing between office- and hospital-based clinics in Taiwan.

Authors:  Wei-Liang Chen; Tung-Wei Kao; Chung-Ching Wang; Yaw-Wen Chang; Li-Wei Wu; Mark L Wahlqvist; Chih-Chieh Chou
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2012-07-10

5.  The effect of screening for cardio-renal risk factors on drug use in the general population.

Authors:  Jarir Atthobari; Ron T Gansevoort; Sipke T Visser; Paul E de Jong; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Prescribing pattern of antihypertensive drugs in primary care units in Turkey: results from the TURKSAHA study.

Authors:  Adnan Abaci; Omer Kozan; Aytekin Oguz; Mahmut Sahin; Necmi Deger; Huseyin Senocak; Nizamettin Toprak; Haydar Sur; Cetin Erol
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Misperceptions about beta-blockers and diuretics: a national survey of primary care physicians.

Authors:  Peter A Ubel; Christopher Jepson; David A Asch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Quality of claims, references and the presentation of risk results in medical journal advertising: a comparative study in Australia, Malaysia and the United States.

Authors:  Noordin Othman; Agnes I Vitry; Elizabeth E Roughead
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  A cross-sectional evidence-based review of pharmaceutical promotional marketing brochures and their underlying studies: is what they tell us important and true?

Authors:  Roberto Cardarelli; John C Licciardone; Lockwood G Taylor
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 10.  Quality of pharmaceutical advertisements in medical journals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noordin Othman; Agnes Vitry; Elizabeth E Roughead
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.