T R Cooney1, M G Poulsen. 1. Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. T.Cooney@mailbox.uq.edu.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of routine follow-up in a selected group of patients with head and neck cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with follow-up of 5 years for all patients. PATIENTS: Three hundred two patients with advanced (stage II or IV) squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx were treated with curative intent with surgery and postoperative radiation therapy between January 1, 1970, and December 31, 1990. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Survival after recurrence of the index tumor or the development of a second head and neck primary tumor. RESULTS: Overall actuarial 5-year survival was 56%. Relapse occurred in 119 patients, and salvage therapy was attempted in 49 patients. Only 2 patients survived to 5 years after relapse. CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, routine follow-up is more important for evaluation of treatment results and emotional support than of benefit in improving patient survival.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of routine follow-up in a selected group of patients with head and neck cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with follow-up of 5 years for all patients. PATIENTS: Three hundred two patients with advanced (stage II or IV) squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx were treated with curative intent with surgery and postoperative radiation therapy between January 1, 1970, and December 31, 1990. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Survival after recurrence of the index tumor or the development of a second head and neck primary tumor. RESULTS: Overall actuarial 5-year survival was 56%. Relapse occurred in 119 patients, and salvage therapy was attempted in 49 patients. Only 2 patients survived to 5 years after relapse. CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, routine follow-up is more important for evaluation of treatment results and emotional support than of benefit in improving patient survival.
Authors: Louise Madeleine Risør; Annika Loft; Anne Kiil Berthelsen; Frederik Cornelius Loft; Andreas Ruhvald Madsen; Ivan Richter Vogelius; Andreas Kjær; Jeppe Friborg Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Antoine Digonnet; Marc Hamoir; Guy Andry; Missak Haigentz; Robert P Takes; Carl E Silver; Dana M Hartl; Primož Strojan; Alessandra Rinaldo; Remco de Bree; Andreas Dietz; Vincent Grégoire; Vinidh Paleri; Johannes A Langendijk; Vincent Vander Poorten; Michael L Hinni; Juan P Rodrigo; Carlos Suárez; William M Mendenhall; Jochen A Werner; Eric M Genden; Alfio Ferlito Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 2.503