Literature DB >> 10207642

Attitudes and interest in genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility in diverse groups of women in western Washington.

S J Durfy1, D J Bowen, A McTiernan, J Sporleder, W Burke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This paper examines the knowledge, opinions, and predictors of interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk in a demographically diverse group of women in western Washington who participated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of breast cancer risk counseling methods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four groups of women were surveyed, all with some family history of breast cancer: (a) 307 white women; (b) 36 African-American women; (c) 87 lesbian/bisexual women; and (d) 113 Ashkenazi Jewish women. As part of the baseline questionnaire for the RCT, participants were asked about their familiarity with genetic testing for breast cancer risk, their interest in such testing and opinions of it, and actions they anticipated based on test results.
RESULTS: Women in all four groups favored ready access to testing, believed the decision to be tested should be a personal choice, believed that genetic test results should stay confidential, and were not greatly concerned that this might not be possible. Women anticipated using such genetic test results to increase the frequency of various breast cancer screening methods (in all four groups, > 69% would increase mammogram frequency, > 85% would increase clinician exam, and > 92% would increase breast self exam). Women overwhelmingly rejected prophylactic surgery as a preventive measure (in all > 80% probably or definitely would not consider it). Significant predictors of interest in genetic testing for cancer risk included perceived risk, cancer worry, and beliefs about access to testing.
CONCLUSIONS: These data will be of interest to health care providers, payers, public health professionals, legislators, and others as they consider issues associated with population testing for susceptibility to common diseases such as breast cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10207642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  49 in total

1.  Psychological distress, health beliefs, and frequency of breast self-examination.

Authors:  J Erblich; D H Bovbjerg; H B Valdimarsdottir
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2000-06

2.  Family histories of breast cancer, coping styles, and psychological adjustment.

Authors:  Youngmee Kim; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2003-06

Review 3.  Research issues in genetic testing of adolescents for obesity.

Authors:  Mary E Segal; Pamela Sankar; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.110

4.  Evaluating women with ovarian cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: missed opportunities.

Authors:  Larissa A Meyer; Meaghan E Anderson; Robin A Lacour; Anuj Suri; Molly S Daniels; Diana L Urbauer; Graciela M Nogueras-Gonzalez; Kathleen M Schmeler; David M Gershenson; Karen H Lu
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  To test or not to test? Moderators of the relationship between risk perceptions and interest in predictive genetic testing.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh; Shiri Ilan
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-09-30

6.  Cultural aspects of cancer genetics: setting a research agenda.

Authors:  B Meiser; M Eisenbruch; K Barlow-Stewart; K Tucker; Z Steel; D Goldstein
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  A model of disease-specific worry in heritable disease: the influence of family history, perceived risk and worry about other illnesses.

Authors:  Terry A DiLorenzo; Julie Schnur; Guy H Montgomery; Joel Erblich; Gary Winkel; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-02-10

Review 8.  Cancers related to genetic mutations: important psychosocial issues for Canadian family physicians.

Authors:  Tara E Power; John Robinson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Impact of Genetic Counseling and Testing on Altruistic Motivations to Test for BRCA1/2: a Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Rahul Garg; Joseph Vogelgesang; Kimberly Kelly
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Sexual orientation and intentions to obtain breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Stacey L Hart; Deborah J Bowen
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.