Literature DB >> 10207627

Cellular response to cancer chemopreventive agents: contribution of the antioxidant responsive element to the adaptive response to oxidative and chemical stress.

J D Hayes1, E M Ellis, G E Neal, D J Harrison, M M Manson.   

Abstract

Cancer chemopreventive agents can act by inhibiting either the acquisition of mutations or the neoplastic processes that occur subsequent to mutagenesis. Compounds that reduce the rate at which mutations arise, referred to as blocking agents, exert their effects largely through their ability to induce the expression of antioxidant and detoxification proteins. This is achieved by the transcriptional activation of a small number of genes that are co-regulated through the presence of an antioxidant responsive element (ARE) in their promoters. Blocking agents can cause gene induction by producing oxidative and/or chemical stress within the cell and, as the inducible proteins act to ameliorate the metabolic insult, the process represents a form of adaptive response. The transcription factors which mediate this response through the ARE are members of the basic leucine zipper superfamily. The mechanism whereby cells sense and respond to the chemical signal(s) generated by chemopreventive blocking agents is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10207627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Soc Symp        ISSN: 0067-8694


  18 in total

1.  Modulation of the glutathione S-transferase in Ochrobactrum anthropi: function of xenobiotic substrates and other forms of stress.

Authors:  B Favaloro; A Tamburro; M A Trofino; L Bologna; D Rotilio; H J Heipieper
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 2.  Chemoprevention: increased potential to bear fruit.

Authors:  C R Wolf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nrf2 is a direct PERK substrate and effector of PERK-dependent cell survival.

Authors:  Sara B Cullinan; Donna Zhang; Mark Hannink; Edward Arvisais; Randal J Kaufman; J Alan Diehl
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Utility of siRNA against Keap1 as a strategy to stimulate a cancer chemopreventive phenotype.

Authors:  Tim W P Devling; Christopher D Lindsay; Lesley I McLellan; Michael McMahon; John D Hayes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Negative regulation of the Nrf1 transcription factor by its N-terminal domain is independent of Keap1: Nrf1, but not Nrf2, is targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum.

Authors:  Yiguo Zhang; Dorothy H Crouch; Masayuki Yamamoto; John D Hayes
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Potency of Michael reaction acceptors as inducers of enzymes that protect against carcinogenesis depends on their reactivity with sulfhydryl groups.

Authors:  A T Dinkova-Kostova; M A Massiah; R E Bozak; R J Hicks; P Talalay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  The UPR and the anti-oxidant response: relevance to sleep and sleep loss.

Authors:  Marishka K Brown; Nirinjini Naidoo
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 5.590

8.  Liver-specific inactivation of the Nrf1 gene in adult mouse leads to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatic neoplasia.

Authors:  Zhenrong Xu; Linyun Chen; Laura Leung; T S Benedict Yen; Candy Lee; Jefferson Y Chan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Purification from rat liver of a novel constitutively expressed member of the aldo-keto reductase 7 family that is widely distributed in extrahepatic tissues.

Authors:  V P Kelly; L S Ireland; E M Ellis; J D Hayes
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 3.857

10.  Identification of a novel Nrf2-regulated antioxidant response element (ARE) in the mouse NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 gene: reassessment of the ARE consensus sequence.

Authors:  Paul Nioi; Michael McMahon; Ken Itoh; Masayuki Yamamoto; John D Hayes
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 3.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.