Literature DB >> 10207337

Autologous versus allogeneic transfusion: patients' perceptions and experiences.

I D Graham1, D Fergusson, H Dokainish, J Biggs, L McAuley, A Laupacis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative autologous donation is one way to decrease a patient's exposure to allogeneic blood transfusion. This study was designed to determine patients' perceptions about the autologous blood donation process and their experiences with transfusion.
METHODS: To assess patient perception, a questionnaire was administered a few days before surgery to patients undergoing elective cardiac and orthopedic surgery in a Canadian teaching hospital. All patients attending the preoperative autologous donation clinic during a 10-month period were eligible. A convenience sample of patients undergoing the same types of surgery who had not predonated blood were selected from preadmission clinics. Patient charts were reviewed retrospectively to assess actual transfusion practice in all cases.
RESULTS: A total of 80 patients underwent cardiac surgery (40 autologous donors, 40 nondonors) and 73 underwent orthopedic surgery (38 autologous donors, 35 nondonors). Of the autologous donors, 75 (96%) attended all scheduled donation appointments, 73 (93%) said that they were "very likely" or "likely" to predonate again, and 75 (96%) said that they would recommend autologous donation to others. There was little difference in preoperative symptoms between the autologous donors and the nondonors, although the former were more likely than the latter to report that their overall health had remained the same during the month before surgery (30 [75%] v. 21 [52%] for the cardiac surgery patients and 30 [79%] v. 18 [51%] for the orthopedic surgery patients). When the autologous donors were asked what they felt their chances would have been of receiving at least one allogeneic blood transfusion had they not predonated, the median response was 80%. When they were asked what their chances were after predonating their own blood, the median response was 0%. The autologous donors were significantly less likely to receive allogeneic blood transfusions (6 [15%] for cardiac surgery and 3 [8%] for orthopedic surgery) than were the nondonors (14 [35%] for cardiac surgery and 16 [46%] for orthopaedic surgery). They were, however, more likely to receive any transfusion (autologous or allogeneic) than were the nondonors (25 [63%] v. 14 [35%] for cardiac surgery and 31 [81%] v. 16 [46%] for orthopedic surgery).
INTERPRETATION: Patients who underwent preoperative autologous blood donation were positive about the experience and did not report more symptoms than patients who did not donate blood preoperatively. Autologous donors overestimated their chances of receiving allogeneic blood transfusions had they not predonated and underestimated their chances after they had predonated. They were less likely to receive allogeneic transfusions, but more likely to receive any type of transfusion, than were patients who did not predonate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10207337      PMCID: PMC1230233     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  13 in total

1.  Moderate and severe reactions during autologous blood donations are no more frequent than during homologous blood donations.

Authors:  P A McVay; A Andrews; M S Hoag; D Polan; S Skettino; L C Stehling; R G Strauss; P T Toy
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.144

2.  Probable reasons that autologous blood was not donated by patients having surgery for which crossmatched blood was ordered.

Authors:  P A McVay; R G Strauss; L C Stehling; P T Toy
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Allogeneic blood transfusions, immunomodulation, and postoperative bacterial infection: do we have the answers yet?

Authors:  M A Blajchman
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Autologous blood: always safer?

Authors:  J V Linden; M S Kruskall
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Donation reactions among autologous donors.

Authors:  P A McVay; A Andrews; E B Kaplan; D B Black; L C Stehling; R G Strauss; P T Toy
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Autologous donation error rates in Canada.

Authors:  M Goldman; S Rémy-Prince; A Trépanier; F Décary
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Preoperative autologous blood donations before elective hysterectomy.

Authors:  M H Kanter; D van Maanen; K H Anders; F Castro; W W Mya; K Clark
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-09-11       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Predeposit autologous blood transfusion: an analysis of donor attitudes and attributes.

Authors:  R Yomtovian; J Ceynar; J L Kepner; M Buhl
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1987-02

9.  An analysis of autologous blood donor motivational factors.

Authors:  R E Domen; L A Ribicki; G A Hoeltge
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.144

10.  [Short donation intervals in preoperative autologous blood donation in the concept of autologous transfusion].

Authors:  M Wittig; P M Osswald; A Lorentz; L Jani
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.041

View more
  6 in total

1.  Bone densitometry: does the emperor have clothes?

Authors:  A Kazanjian; C Green; K Bassett
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-06-29       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Transfusion medicine in another era.

Authors:  T S Wilson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-06-29       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Galloping to the defence of other species.

Authors:  L Burgener
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-06-29       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  [Preoperative autologous blood donation in cardiac surgery. Reduction of allogeneic blood requirements].

Authors:  W Dietrich; R Busley; M Kriner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Evaluation of a decision aid for patients considering autologous blood donation before open-heart surgery.

Authors:  F C Grant; A Laupacis; A M O'Connor; F Rubens; J Robblee
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Effectiveness of preoperative autologous blood donation for protection against allogeneic blood exposure in adult spinal deformity surgeries: a propensity-matched cohort analysis.

Authors:  Michael P Kelly; Lukas P Zebala; Han Jo Kim; Daniel M Sciubba; Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Shay Bess; Eric Klineberg; Gregory Mundis; Douglas Burton; Robert Hart; Alex Soroceanu; Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-09-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.