Literature DB >> 10206284

Prognostic value of DNA flow cytometry in stomach cancer: a 5-year prospective study.

K H Lee1, J S Lee, J H Lee, S W Kim, C Suh, W K Kim, S H Kim, Y I Min, B S Kim, K C Park, M S Lee, H S Sun.   

Abstract

The role of DNA flow cytometry in the prediction of prognosis for patients with stomach cancer remains to be defined. Thus we studied prospectively the role of DNA flow cytometry as a prognosis indicator in stomach cancer patients in a high-incidence area. Between November 1990 and December 1992, primary stomach cancer tissues were obtained from the surgical specimens from 217 patients (148 male, 69 female). DNA flow cytometric analyses of DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction were performed and the results were correlated with patient survival. The median age of the patients was 55 years (range 24-78). Aneuploid cell population was found in 114 of 217 samples (53%). Tumour S-phase fraction was obtained in 96 of 103 diploid tumours (93%) and 61 of 114 aneuploid tumours (54%). After median follow-up of 66.1 months, the patients with tumours with an S-phase fraction over 17% had significantly worse survival rates than patients with tumours with S-phase fractions of lower than 8% or 8-17% (45% vs 59% and 63% of patients surviving, P = 0.007). Tumour ploidy status did not correlate with patient survival. Multivariate analyses showed that the TNM stage remained the most important prognostic indicator. The tumour S-phase fraction was also an independent prognostic indicator (relative risk 2.300, 95% CI, 1.252-4.223). Tumour S-phase fraction obtained by DNA flow cytometry is an independent prognostic indicator for the survival of the patients with stomach cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10206284      PMCID: PMC2362816          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  37 in total

1.  THE TWO HISTOLOGICAL MAIN TYPES OF GASTRIC CARCINOMA: DIFFUSE AND SO-CALLED INTESTINAL-TYPE CARCINOMA. AN ATTEMPT AT A HISTO-CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION.

Authors:  P LAUREN
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand       Date:  1965

2.  Pathologic and phenotypic features of gastric cancer.

Authors:  C M Fenoglio-Preiser; A E Noffsinger; J Belli; G N Stemmermann
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  Gastric cancer heterogeneity.

Authors:  X de Aretxabala; Y Yonemura; K Sugiyama; N Hirose; T Kumaki; S Fushida; K Miwa; I Miyazaki
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Intratumoral regional differences in DNA ploidy of gastrointestinal carcinomas.

Authors:  K Sasaki; T Hashimoto; K Kawachino; M Takahashi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  The prognostic significance of DNA ploidy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  M Sarbia; G Molsberger; R Willers; O Horstmann; C Schroders; R Porschen; E Gabbert H
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Ki-67 immunoreactivity, ploidy and S-phase fraction as prognostic factors in patients with gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  M Victorzon; P J Roberts; C Haglund; K von Boguslawsky; S Nordling
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.935

7.  Clinical significance of DNA ploidy pattern in stage III gastric cancer.

Authors:  M Sakusabe; M Kodama; Y Sato; T Kikuchi; K Koyama
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Clinical importance of near-diploid tumor stem lines in patients with osteosarcoma of an extremity.

Authors:  A T Look; E C Douglass; W H Meyer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-06-16       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Aneuploidy of tumor cells in cases of gastric cancer with esophageal invasion: another indicator of poor prognosis.

Authors:  M Ikeguchi; S Ohfuji; A Oka; S Tsujitani; M Maeta; N Kaibara
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  DNA aneuploidy in gastric carcinoma. Flow cytometric data related to survival, location, and histopathologic findings.

Authors:  H L Flyger; I J Christensen; J Thorup; T U Håkansson; T Nørgaard
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Clinical impact of aneuploidy on gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Isabel Sánchez-Pérez; Pilar García Alonso; Cristóbal Belda Iniesta
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  Genomic and genetic alterations influence the progression of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Stefania Nobili; Lorenzo Bruno; Ida Landini; Cristina Napoli; Paolo Bechi; Francesco Tonelli; Carlos A Rubio; Enrico Mini; Gabriella Nesi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.