Literature DB >> 10203627

Willingness to pay for diagnostic certainty: comparing patients, physicians, and managed care executives.

R A Hirth1, B S Bloom, M E Chernew, A M Fendrick.   

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness analyses routinely ignore the value of diagnostic certainty. Moreover, no previous study has compared this value among different stakeholders. We surveyed 25 patients, 28 physicians, and 23 managed care executives to compare their willingness to pay for diagnostic information for peptic ulcer disease. Patients (84%) were most likely, and executives (43%) least likely, to be willing to pay at least $1 (median willingness to pay < $50). Differences in willingness to pay among stakeholders indicate potential for conflicts over access to tests. Although nearly all patients valued diagnostic certainty, its value was generally small and insufficient to change the cost-effectiveness ranking of treatment alternatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10203627      PMCID: PMC1496554          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00313.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  2 in total

1.  Practical implementation of a multiplex PCR for acute respiratory tract infections in children.

Authors:  Paul Gruteke; Afina S Glas; Mirjam Dierdorp; Willem B Vreede; Jan-Willem Pilon; Sylvia M Bruisten
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Reasons underlying interhospital transfers to an academic medical intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jason Wagner; Theodore J Iwashyna; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.425

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.