BACKGROUND: We evaluated peripheral blood microchimerism in 48 consecutive organ transplant recipients (35 kidneys, ten livers, one kidney-liver, one kidney-pancreatic islet, one kidney pancreas) up to 12 months post-transplantation. Patients were categorized according to the presence or absence of rejection episodes, and the patterns of microchimerism in the two groups were then compared. METHODS: DNA was extracted from donor, pre-transplant, and post-transplant peripheral blood samples. Several polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays were developed for the detection of microchimerism. Assay sensitivities ranged from 0.0001 to 3%. RESULTS: Microchimerism was detected only in sex-mismatched cases (male donors and female recipients) using nested PCR for a Y-chromosome marker. There were ten such cases (six kidneys, two livers, and two combined organ transplants). In patients without rejection (n = 7), there was a peak of donor-DNA at 1-3 wk post-transplantation followed by a second peak between 3 wk and 4 months. In patients with biopsy-proven rejection (n = 3), the peaks were absent and the levels of microchimerism were extremely low (< 0.001%). Microchimerism levels declined in all 10 patients and were barely detectable 1 yr post-transplantation. Microchimerism was not detected in the remaining 38 patients despite using a battery of sensitive PCR-based assays. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, microchimerism was detected using the Y-chromosome PCR assay only and the level of donor-DNA in a given patient varied over time. This study highlights the difficulties in establishing a correlation between microchimerism and transplant tolerance.
BACKGROUND: We evaluated peripheral blood microchimerism in 48 consecutive organ transplant recipients (35 kidneys, ten livers, one kidney-liver, one kidney-pancreatic islet, one kidney pancreas) up to 12 months post-transplantation. Patients were categorized according to the presence or absence of rejection episodes, and the patterns of microchimerism in the two groups were then compared. METHODS: DNA was extracted from donor, pre-transplant, and post-transplant peripheral blood samples. Several polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays were developed for the detection of microchimerism. Assay sensitivities ranged from 0.0001 to 3%. RESULTS: Microchimerism was detected only in sex-mismatched cases (male donors and female recipients) using nested PCR for a Y-chromosome marker. There were ten such cases (six kidneys, two livers, and two combined organ transplants). In patients without rejection (n = 7), there was a peak of donor-DNA at 1-3 wk post-transplantation followed by a second peak between 3 wk and 4 months. In patients with biopsy-proven rejection (n = 3), the peaks were absent and the levels of microchimerism were extremely low (< 0.001%). Microchimerism levels declined in all 10 patients and were barely detectable 1 yr post-transplantation. Microchimerism was not detected in the remaining 38 patients despite using a battery of sensitive PCR-based assays. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, microchimerism was detected using the Y-chromosome PCR assay only and the level of donor-DNA in a given patient varied over time. This study highlights the difficulties in establishing a correlation between microchimerism and transplant tolerance.
Authors: Laetitia Albano; Justyna M Rak; Doua F Azzouz; Elisabeth Cassuto-Viguier; Jean Gugenheim; Nathalie C Lambert Journal: Chimerism Date: 2012-04-01