OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of several diagnostic tests used in the evaluation of vertigo. STUDY DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis, using data from retrospective case review. METHODS: Charts and test results were reviewed from 192 outpatients seen in an academic tertiary referral center for evaluation of vertigo. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using decision analysis software, data from office and hospital charges, and expert-based estimations of the utility of different test outcomes. Sensitivity analysis was performed using standard algorithms and wide variable ranges. RESULTS: We found that audiologic testing, posturography, and electronystagmography were the most cost-effective tests, and that magnetic resonance imaging and blood tests had the lowest cost-effectiveness. The analysis was sensitive to the effects of financial costs of tests but, with a few exceptions, was typically not sensitive to the utility of test outcomes or the distribution of test results. CONCLUSIONS: The use of cost-effectiveness analysis, the estimation of utility of test outcomes, and techniques of sensitivity analysis should help guide the clinician's decision making on appropriate testing for patients with vertigo.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of several diagnostic tests used in the evaluation of vertigo. STUDY DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis, using data from retrospective case review. METHODS: Charts and test results were reviewed from 192 outpatients seen in an academic tertiary referral center for evaluation of vertigo. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using decision analysis software, data from office and hospital charges, and expert-based estimations of the utility of different test outcomes. Sensitivity analysis was performed using standard algorithms and wide variable ranges. RESULTS: We found that audiologic testing, posturography, and electronystagmography were the most cost-effective tests, and that magnetic resonance imaging and blood tests had the lowest cost-effectiveness. The analysis was sensitive to the effects of financial costs of tests but, with a few exceptions, was typically not sensitive to the utility of test outcomes or the distribution of test results. CONCLUSIONS: The use of cost-effectiveness analysis, the estimation of utility of test outcomes, and techniques of sensitivity analysis should help guide the clinician's decision making on appropriate testing for patients with vertigo.
Authors: Maureen Chase; Joshua N Goldstein; Magdy H Selim; Daniel J Pallin; Marc A Camacho; Jennifer L O'Connor; Long Ngo; Jonathan A Edlow Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2014-01-04 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Ola Alsalman; Jan Ost; Robby Vanspauwen; Catherine Blaivie; Dirk De Ridder; Sven Vanneste Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 3.240