Literature DB >> 10201676

Ropivacaine or 2% mepivacaine for lower limb peripheral nerve blocks. Study Group on Orthopedic Anesthesia of the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, and Intensive Care.

A Casati1, G Fanelli, B Borghi, G Torri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intra- and postoperative clinical properties of sciatic-femoral nerve block performed with either ropivacaine at different concentrations or mepivacaine have been evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, blinded study.
METHODS: Adult patients scheduled for foot and ankle surgery were randomized to receive combined sciatic-femoral nerve block with 225 mg of either 0.5% (n = 83), 0.75% (n = 87), or 1% (n = 86) ropivacaine, or with 500 mg of 2% mepivacaine (n = 84). A thigh tourniquet was used in all patients. Onset time, adequacy of surgical anesthesia, time to offset of nerve block, and time until first postoperative requirement for pain medication were evaluated by a blinded observer.
RESULTS: The adequacy of nerve block was similar in the four treatment groups (the ratios between adequate:inadequate: failed blocks were 74:9:0 with 0.5% ropivacaine, 74:13:0 with 0.75% ropivacaine, 78:8:0 with 1% ropivacaine, and 72:12:0 with 2% mepivacaine). The onset of the block was slower with 0.5% ropivacaine than with other anesthetic solutions (P < 0.001). Regardless of the concentration, ropivacaine produced a longer motor blockade (10.5+/-3.8 h, 10.3+/-4.3 h, and 10.2+/-5.1 h with 0.5%, 0.75%, and 1% ropivacaine, respectively) than with mepivacaine (4.3+/-2.6 h; P < 0.001). The duration of postoperative analgesia was shorter after mepivacaine (5.1+/-2.7 h) than after ropivacaine (12.2+/-4.1 h, 14.3+/-5 h, and 14.5+/-3.4 h, with 0.5%, 0.75%, or 1% ropivacaine, respectively; P < 0.001). Pain relief after 0.5% ropivacaine was 14% shorter than 0.75% or 1% ropivacaine (P < 0.05). During the first 24 h after surgery, 30-37% of patients receiving ropivacaine required no analgesics compared with 10% of those receiving mepivacaine (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that 0.75% ropivacaine is the most suitable choice of local anesthetic for combined sciatic-femoral nerve block, providing an onset similar to mepivacaine and prolonged postoperative analgesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10201676     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199904000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  11 in total

1.  A comparison of ankle block and spinal anesthesia for foot surgery.

Authors:  Aykut Urfalioglu; Onur Gokdemir; Onur Hanbeyoglu; Bora Bilal; Gozen Oksuz; Melike Toker; Leyla Gungor
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

Review 2.  Ropivacaine: a review of its use in regional anaesthesia and acute pain management.

Authors:  Dene Simpson; Monique P Curran; Vicki Oldfield; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Peripheral nerve blocks for perioperative management of patients having orthopedic surgery or trauma of the lower extremity.

Authors:  Takashige Iwata; Sundaram Lakshman; Alpana Singh; Marina Yufa; Rich Claudio; Admir Hadzić
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.363

4.  Anesthetic efficacy of different ropivacaine concentrations for inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  Eman El-Sharrawy; John A Yagiela
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2006

Review 5.  Anaesthetic agents for advanced regional anaesthesia: a North American perspective.

Authors:  Chester C Buckenmaier; Lisa L Bleckner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Ropivacaine: an update of its use in regional anaesthesia.

Authors:  K J McClellan; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Similar analgesic effect after popliteal fossa nerve blockade with 0.375% and 0.75% bupivacaine.

Authors:  Jacques T Ya Deau; Barbara U Wukovits; Vincent R LaSala; Kethy M Jules-Elysée; Leonardo Paroli; Richard L Kahn; David S Levine; Jane Y Lipnitsky
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2007-09

8.  Comparative evaluation of ropivacaine and lignocaine with ropivacaine, lignocaine and clonidine combination during peribulbar anaesthesia for phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

Authors:  Balbir Khan; Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa; Ravi Vohra; Sukhwinder Singh; Rajwinder Kaur
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2012-01

9.  0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% ropivacaine: Are they different in ultrasound-guided sciatic block?

Authors:  Charles Pham Dang; Cécile Langlois; Chantal Lambert; Jean-Michel Nguyen; Karim Asehnoune; Corinne Lejus
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2015-01

10.  A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing dexamethasone and clonidine as adjuvants to a ropivacaine sciatic popliteal block for foot surgery.

Authors:  Kris Vermeylen; Joris De Puydt; Stefan Engelen; Eva Roofthooft; Filiep Soetens; Arne Neyrinck; Marc Van de Velde
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2016-05-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.