Literature DB >> 10201321

Reliability of cranial flap fixation techniques: comparative experimental evaluation of suturing, titanium miniplates, and a new rivet-like titanium clamp (CranioFix): technical note.

K D Lerch1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To ensure patients' safety, the mechanical strength of cranial flap refixation techniques and implants (sutures, titanium miniplates, and new rivet-like titanium clamps) had to be validated.
METHODS: With craniotomied cadaver skulls for each refixation technique, load-bearing tests were performed by applying an external force until an impression depth of the cranial flap of 2 mm was reached and the results were compared.
RESULTS: CranioFix (Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany) and miniplates were revealed to be the strongest fixation devices, although with miniplates, the plastic deformation started from the beginning of load application, whereas CranioFix additionally provided a better spring-elastic reserve and a higher reproducibility of fixation strength not dependent on bone thickness and consistency. Flaps fixed by sutures were dislocated from the start.
CONCLUSION: Although CranioFix offers distinct advantages over miniplates, both proved to be definitely superior to suturing, which is still used in many centers. Therefore, whether suturing can still be regarded as a state-of-the-art technique must be reconsidered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10201321     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199904000-00137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  9 in total

1.  Repositioning of Cranial Bone Flaps Cut with a Diamond-Coated Threadwire Saw: 5-Year Experience with Cosmetic Cranioplasty without Fixation Devices.

Authors:  Satoru Shimizu; Koji Kondo; Tomoya Yamazaki; Kenji Nakayama; Isao Yamamoto; Kiyotaka Fujii
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2011-09

2.  Aesthetic issues in neurosurgery: a protocol to improve cosmetic outcome in cranial surgery.

Authors:  Alessandro Frati; Angelo Pichierri; Vincenzo Esposito; Riccardo Frati; Roberto Delfini; Giampaolo Cantore; Stefano Bastianello; Antonio Santoro
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Titanium Clamps for a Simple Low-Profile Autologous Osteosynthesis in the Reconstruction of Posttraumatic Craniofacial Convexital Skeletal Disruption.

Authors:  Amos Olufemi Adeleye; Toluyemi Adefolarin Malomo
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2016-10-17

4.  Mini titanium plates; hearkening the end of non-rigid cranial bone flap fixation.

Authors:  Muhammad Junaid; Syed Sarmad Bukhari; Mobasher Ahmad Saeed; Mamoon Ur Rashid
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  A new device for bone cranial flap fixation: Technical note and surgical remarks. A multicentric experience.

Authors:  Manolo Piccirilli; Giannantonio Spena; Enrico Marchese; Maria Pia Tropeano; Antonio Santoro
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-02-23

6.  Bioresorbable plate fracture after cranioplasty caused by head injury: a pediatric case.

Authors:  Kohei Igarashi; Atsushi Kuge; Hiroshi Homma; Tetsu Yamaki; Rei Kondo; Shinjiro Saito; Yukihiko Sonoda
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-12-20

7.  Impartation of apatite-forming ability to chitosan nanofibres by using apatite nuclei.

Authors:  Yu Adachi; Takeshi Yabutsuka; Shigeomi Takai
Journal:  IET Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.847

8.  Cosmetic frontotemporal craniotomy using an osteotome: technical note.

Authors:  Yoshinori Sakata; Hiromu Hadeishi; Junta Moroi
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Skull Bone Regeneration Using Chitosan⁻Siloxane Porous Hybrids-Long-Term Implantation.

Authors:  Yuki Shirosaki; Motomasa Furuse; Takuji Asano; Yoshihiko Kinoshita; Toshihiko Kuroiwa
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 6.321

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.