Literature DB >> 10201016

Measurement of the delivery of dialysis in acute renal failure.

J A Evanson1, T A Ikizler, R Wingard, S Knights, Y Shyr, G Schulman, J Himmelfarb, R M Hakim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies in patients with acute renal failure (ARF) have shown a relationship between the delivered dose of dialysis and patient survival. However, there is currently no consensus on the appropriate method to measure the dose of dialysis in ARF patients. In this study, the dose of dialysis was measured by blood- and dialysate-based kinetic methods in a group of ARF patients who required intermittent hemodialysis.
METHODS: Treatments were performed using a Fresenius 2008E volumetric hemodialysis machine with the ability to fractionally collect the spent dialysate. Single-, double-pool, and equilibrated Kt/V were determined from the pre-, immediate post-, and 30-minute post-blood urea nitrogen (BUN) measurements. The solute reduction index was determined from the collected dialysate, as well as the single- and double-pool Kt/V.
RESULTS: Forty-six treatments in 28 consecutive patients were analyzed. The mean prescribed Kt/V (1.11 +/- 0.32) was significantly greater than the delivered dose estimated by single-pool (0.96 +/- 0.33), equilibrated (0.84 +/- 0.28), and double-pool (0.84 +/- 0.30) Kt/V (compared with prescribed, each P < 0.001). There was no statistical difference between the equilibrated and double-pool Kt/V (P = NS). The solute removal index, as determined from the dialysate, corresponded to a Kt/V of 0.56 +/- 0.27 and was significantly lower than the single-pool and double-pool Kt/V (each P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Blood-based kinetics used to estimate the dose of dialysis in ARF patients on intermittent hemodialysis provide internally consistent results. However, when compared with dialysate-side kinetics, blood-based kinetics substantially overestimated the amount of solute (urea) removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10201016     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00355.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  8 in total

Review 1.  Acute renal failure is not a "cute" renal failure!

Authors:  Wilfred Druml
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Effluent volume in continuous renal replacement therapy overestimates the delivered dose of dialysis.

Authors:  Rolando Claure-Del Granado; Etienne Macedo; Glenn M Chertow; Sharon Soroko; Jonathan Himmelfarb; T Alp Ikizler; Emil P Paganini; Ravindra L Mehta
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Toward the optimal dose metric in continuous renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Rolando Claure-Del Granado; Etienne Macedo; Glenn M Chertow; Sharon Soroko; Jonathan Himmelfarb; T Alp Ikizler; Emil P Paganini; Ravindra L Mehta
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.595

4.  Ionic dialysance: a new valid parameter for quantification of dialysis efficiency in acute renal failure?

Authors:  Christophe Ridel; David Osman; Lucile Mercadal; Nadia Anguel; Thierry Petitclerc; Christian Richard; Christophe Vinsonneau
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Management of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury: a survey of practitioner prescribing practices.

Authors:  Pamela Overberger; Matthew Pesacreta; Paul M Palevsky
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Section 5: Dialysis Interventions for Treatment of AKI.

Authors: 
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl (2011)       Date:  2012-03

Review 7.  Dialysis dose in acute kidney injury: no time for therapeutic nihilism--a critical appraisal of the Acute Renal Failure Trial Network study.

Authors:  Claudio Ronco; Dinna Cruz; Helen Oudemans van Straaten; Patrick Honore; Andrew House; Du Bin; Noel Gibney
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 8.  Contrast-induced acute kidney injury and renal support for acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 2).

Authors:  Norbert Lameire; John A Kellum
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 9.097

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.