CONTEXT: International differences in compliance of patients undergoing hemodialysis are poorly characterized and could contribute to international survival differences. OBJECTIVE: To compare international differences in patient compliance with hemodialysis treatments. DESIGN: A prospective observational study of patients undergoing hemodialysis in 1995 and a cross-sectional survey of health care professionals caring for hemodialyzed patients in 1996. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Four dialysis centers in the southeastern United States with 415 patients undergoing hemodialysis, 1 center in Sweden with 84 patients, and 4 centers in Japan with 194 patients participated in the prospective observational study. In the cross-sectional survey, nurses and nephrologists from the United States (n = 49), Japan (n = 21), and Sweden (n = 16) responded to questions regarding the compliance of their patients undergoing hemodialysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of patients who miss a dialysis treatment and number of missed dialysis treatments. RESULTS: Of 415 US patients, 147 missed 699 treatments over a 6-month period (28.1 missed treatments per 100 patient-months or 2.3% of all prescribed treatments). During a 3-month period, there were 0 missed treatments per 100 patient-months for patients from Japan and 0 missed treatments per 100 patient-months for patients from Sweden (P<.001). In the cross-sectional survey, the mean (SD) estimated percentage of patients missing a treatment per month was 4% (3%) for the United States, 0% for Japan, and 0.1% (3%) for Sweden (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Noncompliance is much more common in US patients undergoing hemodialysis than Swedish and Japanese patients. The implications of these results for international differences in survival deserve further study.
CONTEXT: International differences in compliance of patients undergoing hemodialysis are poorly characterized and could contribute to international survival differences. OBJECTIVE: To compare international differences in patient compliance with hemodialysis treatments. DESIGN: A prospective observational study of patients undergoing hemodialysis in 1995 and a cross-sectional survey of health care professionals caring for hemodialyzed patients in 1996. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Four dialysis centers in the southeastern United States with 415 patients undergoing hemodialysis, 1 center in Sweden with 84 patients, and 4 centers in Japan with 194 patients participated in the prospective observational study. In the cross-sectional survey, nurses and nephrologists from the United States (n = 49), Japan (n = 21), and Sweden (n = 16) responded to questions regarding the compliance of their patients undergoing hemodialysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of patients who miss a dialysis treatment and number of missed dialysis treatments. RESULTS: Of 415 US patients, 147 missed 699 treatments over a 6-month period (28.1 missed treatments per 100 patient-months or 2.3% of all prescribed treatments). During a 3-month period, there were 0 missed treatments per 100 patient-months for patients from Japan and 0 missed treatments per 100 patient-months for patients from Sweden (P<.001). In the cross-sectional survey, the mean (SD) estimated percentage of patients missing a treatment per month was 4% (3%) for the United States, 0% for Japan, and 0.1% (3%) for Sweden (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Noncompliance is much more common in US patients undergoing hemodialysis than Swedish and Japanese patients. The implications of these results for international differences in survival deserve further study.
Authors: Youngmee Kim; Lorraine S Evangelista; Linda R Phillips; Carol Pavlish; Joel D Kopple Journal: Nephrol Nurs J Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 0.959
Authors: Julie Yun Chen; Eric Yuk Fai Wan; Edmond Pui Hang Choi; Anca Ka Chun Chan; Karina Hiu Yen Chan; Joyce Pui Yan Tsang; Cindy Lo Kuen Lam Journal: Patient Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 3.883
Authors: Fadi Tohme; Maria K Mor; Julio Pena-Polanco; Jamie A Green; Michael J Fine; Paul M Palevsky; Steven D Weisbord Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Udaya P Udayaraj; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Paul Roderick; Retha Steenkamp; David Ansell; Charles R V Tomson; Fergus J Caskey Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2009-04-08 Impact factor: 8.237