CONTEXT: Preclinical studies suggest that estrogen affects neural structure and function in mature animals; clinical studies are less conclusive with many, but not all, studies showing a positive influence of estrogen on verbal memory in postmenopausal women. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of estrogen on brain activation patterns in postmenopausal women as they performed verbal and nonverbal working memory tasks. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial from 1996 through 1998. SETTING:Community volunteers tested in a hospital setting. PATIENTS: Forty-six postmenopausal women aged 33 to 61 years (mean [SD] age, 50.8 [4.7] years). INTERVENTION: Twenty-one-day treatment with conjugated equine estrogens, 1.25 mg/d, randomly crossed over with identical placebo and a 14-day washout between treatments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Brain activation patterns measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging during tasks involving verbal and nonverbal working memory. RESULTS: Treatment with estrogen increased activation in the inferior parietal lobule during storage of verbal material and decreased activation in the inferior parietal lobule during storage of nonverbal material. Estrogen also increased activation in the right superior frontal gyrus during retrieval tasks, accompanied by greater left-hemisphere activation during encoding. The latter pattern represents a sharpening of the hemisphere encoding/retrieval asymmetry (HERA) effect. Estrogen did not affect actual performance of the verbal and nonverbal memory tasks. CONCLUSIONS:Estrogen in a therapeutic dosage alters brain activation patterns in postmenopausal women in specific brain regions during the performance of the sorts of memory function that are called upon frequently during any given day. These results suggest that estrogen affects brain organization for memory in postmenopausal women.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Preclinical studies suggest that estrogen affects neural structure and function in mature animals; clinical studies are less conclusive with many, but not all, studies showing a positive influence of estrogen on verbal memory in postmenopausal women. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of estrogen on brain activation patterns in postmenopausal women as they performed verbal and nonverbal working memory tasks. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial from 1996 through 1998. SETTING: Community volunteers tested in a hospital setting. PATIENTS: Forty-six postmenopausal women aged 33 to 61 years (mean [SD] age, 50.8 [4.7] years). INTERVENTION: Twenty-one-day treatment with conjugated equine estrogens, 1.25 mg/d, randomly crossed over with identical placebo and a 14-day washout between treatments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Brain activation patterns measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging during tasks involving verbal and nonverbal working memory. RESULTS: Treatment with estrogen increased activation in the inferior parietal lobule during storage of verbal material and decreased activation in the inferior parietal lobule during storage of nonverbal material. Estrogen also increased activation in the right superior frontal gyrus during retrieval tasks, accompanied by greater left-hemisphere activation during encoding. The latter pattern represents a sharpening of the hemisphere encoding/retrieval asymmetry (HERA) effect. Estrogen did not affect actual performance of the verbal and nonverbal memory tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Estrogen in a therapeutic dosage alters brain activation patterns in postmenopausal women in specific brain regions during the performance of the sorts of memory function that are called upon frequently during any given day. These results suggest that estrogen affects brain organization for memory in postmenopausal women.
Authors: Julie A Dumas; Brenna C McDonald; Andrew J Saykin; Thomas W McAllister; Mary L Hynes; John D West; Paul A Newhouse Journal: Menopause Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Gioia M Guerrieri; Paul G Wakim; P A Keenan; Linda A Schenkel; Kate Berlin; Carolyn J Gibson; David R Rubinow; Peter J Schmidt Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2015-12-21 Impact factor: 3.139