Literature DB >> 10199353

Prevalence and detection of serious psychiatric disorder in defendants attending court.

J Shaw1, F Creed, J Price, P Huxley, B Tomenson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diversion programmes in magistrates' courts are designed to provide immediate advice or access to mental-health treatment facilities for defendants when appropriate. The prevalence of serious psychiatric disorder and the proportion of defendants who might require transfer are unknown. We undertook a study to address these issues and to find out whether defendants with such disorders are reliably detected by court personnel and referred to psychiatric staff in court diversion programmes.
METHODS: A two-phase screening method used questionnaires for psychiatric disorder (the general health questionnaire and psychotic screening questionnaire) and screening instruments for alcohol and substance misuse followed by standard psychiatric interview (schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry). The detection rate of defendants with serious psychiatric disorder by court staff was observed.
FINDINGS: The frequency of serious psychiatric disorder was 1.31% (three of 229) among defendants appearing in court direct from the community and 6.57% (96 of 1460) among those held in custody overnight. Of the 99 defendants with serious psychiatric disorder, 34 had schizophrenia and other psychoses and 55 had depressive disorders. 42 (76%) of the 55 individuals with depressive disorders had suicidal ideas, which were recorded on the first-phase screening questionnaire in many cases. Only 14 of 96 defendants from overnight custody with serious psychiatric disorder were detected by court staff and referred to the court diversion programme.
INTERPRETATION: There is a substantial rate of psychiatric disorder in the court population, which is not satisfactorily detected with the current system. Brief screening questionnaires and training of court staff are probably necessary for detection of people with serious psychiatric disorder passing through the courts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10199353     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)08094-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  6 in total

1.  Psychopathology in adolescent and young adult criminal offenders (15-21 years) in Sweden.

Authors:  Mina Fazel; Niklas Långström; Martin Grann; Seena Fazel
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Changes in the provision of institutionalized mental health care in post-communist countries.

Authors:  Adrian P Mundt; Tanja Frančišković; Isaac Gurovich; Andreas Heinz; Yuriy Ignatyev; Fouad Ismayilov; Miklós Péter Kalapos; Valery Krasnov; Adriana Mihai; Jan Mir; Dzianis Padruchny; Matej Potočan; Jiří Raboch; Māris Taube; Marta Welbel; Stefan Priebe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Prevalence of mental disorders in defendants at criminal court.

Authors:  Penelope Brown; Ioannis Bakolis; Elizabeth Appiah-Kusi; Nicholas Hallett; Matthew Hotopf; Nigel Blackwood
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2022-05-12

4.  Implementing a court diversion and liaison scheme in a remand prison by systematic screening of new receptions: a 6 year participatory action research study of 20,084 consecutive male remands.

Authors:  Clare McInerney; Mary Davoren; Grainne Flynn; Diane Mullins; Mary Fitzpatrick; Martin Caddow; Fintan Caddow; Sean Quigley; Fergal Black; Harry G Kennedy; Conor O'Neill
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2013-06-25

5.  Severe mental illness, common mental disorders, and neurodevelopmental conditions amongst 9088 lower court attendees in London, UK.

Authors:  Eddie Chaplin; Jane McCarthy; Salma Ali; Karina Marshall-Tate; Kiriakos Xenitidis; Denise Harvey; Jessica Childs; Samir Srivastava; Iain McKinnon; Louise Robinson; Clare S Allely; Sally Hardy; Barry Tolchard; Andrew Forrester
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.144

Review 6.  Police custody health care: a review of health morbidity, models of care and innovations within police custody in the UK, with international comparisons.

Authors:  Iain G McKinnon; Stuart Dm Thomas; Heather L Noga; Jane Senior
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2016-09-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.