Literature DB >> 10199245

Modified open-door laminoplasty for treatment of neurological deficits in younger patients with congenital spinal stenosis: analysis of clinical and radiographic data.

C I Shaffrey1, G C Wiggins, C B Piccirilli, J N Young, L R Lovell.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Multilevel anterior cervical decompressive surgery and fusion effectively treats cervical myeloradiculopathy that is caused by severe cervical spinal stenosis, but degenerative changes at adjacent vertebral levels frequently result in long-term morbidity. The authors performed a modified open-door laminoplasty procedure in which allograft bone and titanium miniplates were used to treat cervical myeloradiculopathy in younger patients with congenital canal stenosis while maintaining functional cervical motion segments. Pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and/or computerized tomography myelography were performed to assess changes in cervical spinal canal dimensions. Pre- and postoperative flexion-extension radiographs were compared to determine the residual motion of the targeted operative segments.
METHODS: Twenty younger patients (average age 37.7 years) underwent modified open-door laminoplasty for treatment of myelopathy or myeloradiculopathy related to significant cervical spinal stenosis with or without associated central or lateral disc herniation or foraminal stenosis. These surgeries were performed during a 2-year period and follow-up review remains ongoing (average follow-up period 21.6 months). Reconstructive procedures were performed on an average of 4.1 levels (range three-six). Operative time averaged 186 minutes (range 93-229 minutes). Average blood loss was 305 ml (range 100-650 ml). No cases were complicated by neurological deterioration, infection, wound breakdown, graft displacement, or hardware failure. The patients' Nurick Scale grade improved from a preoperative average of 1.8 to a postoperative average of 0.5. Pre- and postoperative sagittal spinal diameter averaged 11.2 mm (8-14 mm) and 16.6 mm (13-19 mm), respectively. The sagittal compression ratio (sagittal/lateral x 100%) increased from 48% pre- to 72% postoperatively. The spinal canal area increased an average of 55% (range 19-127%). In patients in whom pre- and postoperative flexion-extension radiographs were obtained, 72.7% residual neck motion was maintained. No patient developed increased neck or shoulder pain. Neurological symptoms improved in all patients, with total relief of myelopathy in 50% and partial improvement in 50%.
CONCLUSIONS: Modified open-door laminoplasty with allograft bone and titanium miniplates effectively treats neurological deficits in younger patients with congenital and spinal stenosis. Although long-term results are unknown, short-term results are good and there is a low incidence of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10199245     DOI: 10.3171/spi.1999.90.2.0170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  12 in total

1.  Open Door Laminoplasty: Creation Of A New Vertebral Arch.

Authors:  Monica Lara-Almunia; Javier Hernandez-Vicente
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-02-09

2.  Screw Back-Out Following "Open-Door" Cervical Laminoplasty: A Review of 165 Plates.

Authors:  Gabriel Liu; Jacob M Buchowski; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-12-08

3.  Surgical Management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Wesley Hsu; Michael J Dorsi; Timothy F Witham
Journal:  Neurosurg Q       Date:  2009-12-01

4.  Analysis of the outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, undergone canal expansive laminoplasty supported with instrumentation in a group of Indian population - a prospective study.

Authors:  Subhadip Mandal; U Banerjee; A S Mukherjee; Subhajyoti Mandal; Srikanta Kundu
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-04-29

5.  Post-laminectomy kyphosis in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament : does it cause neurological deterioration?

Authors:  Won-Sang Cho; Chun Kee Chung; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Hyun Jib Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2008-06-20

6.  Regression of Disc-Osteophyte Complexes Following Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy with Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Remi M Ajiboye; Stephen D Zoller; Adedayo A Ashana; Akshay Sharma; William Sheppard; Langston T Holly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06-12

7.  Double-door laminoplasty in managing multilevel myelopathy: technique description and literature review.

Authors:  M Orabi; S Chibbaro; O Makiese; J F Cornelius; B George
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Laminoplasty techniques for the treatment of multilevel cervical stenosis.

Authors:  Lance K Mitsunaga; Eric O Klineberg; Munish C Gupta
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-03-06

Review 9.  Laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Manabu Ito; Ken Nagahama
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2012-08-24

Review 10.  Cervical Laminoplasty: The History and the Future.

Authors:  Ryu Kurokawa; Phyo Kim
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.