CONTEXT: Researchers and practitioners are increasingly realizing that improvements in public health require changes in individual, social, and economic factors. Concurrent with this renewed awareness there has been a growing interest in working with communities to create healthful changes through academic/practice/community research partnerships. However, this type of research presents different challenges and requires different skills than traditional research projects. The development of a set of principles of practice for these types of research projects can assist researchers in developing, implementing, and evaluating their partnerships and their project activities. OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the different ways in which academics and community groups may work together, including academic/practice/community partnerships. Several principles of practice for engaging in these research partnerships are presented followed by a description of how these principles have been put into operation in a family violence prevention program. CONCLUSIONS: The principles presented are: (1) identify the best processes/model to be used based on the nature of the issue and the intended outcome; (2) acknowledge the difference between community input and active community involvement; (3) develop relationships based on mutual trust and respect; (4) acknowledge and honor different partner's "agendas"; (5) consider multi-disciplinary approaches; (6) use evaluation strategies that are consistent with the overall approach taken in the academic/practice/community partnership; and (7) be aware of partnership maturation and associated transition periods. The limitations of these principles and their application in various settings are discussed.
CONTEXT: Researchers and practitioners are increasingly realizing that improvements in public health require changes in individual, social, and economic factors. Concurrent with this renewed awareness there has been a growing interest in working with communities to create healthful changes through academic/practice/community research partnerships. However, this type of research presents different challenges and requires different skills than traditional research projects. The development of a set of principles of practice for these types of research projects can assist researchers in developing, implementing, and evaluating their partnerships and their project activities. OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the different ways in which academics and community groups may work together, including academic/practice/community partnerships. Several principles of practice for engaging in these research partnerships are presented followed by a description of how these principles have been put into operation in a family violence prevention program. CONCLUSIONS: The principles presented are: (1) identify the best processes/model to be used based on the nature of the issue and the intended outcome; (2) acknowledge the difference between community input and active community involvement; (3) develop relationships based on mutual trust and respect; (4) acknowledge and honor different partner's "agendas"; (5) consider multi-disciplinary approaches; (6) use evaluation strategies that are consistent with the overall approach taken in the academic/practice/community partnership; and (7) be aware of partnership maturation and associated transition periods. The limitations of these principles and their application in various settings are discussed.
Authors: Laurie A Lindamer; Barry D Lebowitz; Richard L Hough; Piedad Garcia; Alfredo Aquirre; Maureen C Halpain; Colin Depp; Dilip V Jeste Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Suzanne Christopher; Vanessa Watts; Alma Knows His Gun McCormick; Sara Young Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-06-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Steve Wing; Rachel Avery Horton; Naeema Muhammad; Gary R Grant; Mansoureh Tajik; Kendall Thu Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-06-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Kimberley D Lakes; Elaine Vaughan; Jennifer Pham; Tuyet Tran; Marissa Jones; Dean Baker; James M Swanson; Ellen Olshansky Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 4.689
Authors: Clement K Gwede; Janelle M Menard; Dinorah Martinez-Tyson; Ji-Hyun Lee; Susan T Vadaparampil; Tapan A Padhya; Cathy D Meade Journal: Health Promot Pract Date: 2009-06-10