Literature DB >> 10198685

Principles of practice for academic/practice/community research partnerships.

E A Baker1, S Homan, R Schonhoff, M Kreuter.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Researchers and practitioners are increasingly realizing that improvements in public health require changes in individual, social, and economic factors. Concurrent with this renewed awareness there has been a growing interest in working with communities to create healthful changes through academic/practice/community research partnerships. However, this type of research presents different challenges and requires different skills than traditional research projects. The development of a set of principles of practice for these types of research projects can assist researchers in developing, implementing, and evaluating their partnerships and their project activities.
OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the different ways in which academics and community groups may work together, including academic/practice/community partnerships. Several principles of practice for engaging in these research partnerships are presented followed by a description of how these principles have been put into operation in a family violence prevention program.
CONCLUSIONS: The principles presented are: (1) identify the best processes/model to be used based on the nature of the issue and the intended outcome; (2) acknowledge the difference between community input and active community involvement; (3) develop relationships based on mutual trust and respect; (4) acknowledge and honor different partner's "agendas"; (5) consider multi-disciplinary approaches; (6) use evaluation strategies that are consistent with the overall approach taken in the academic/practice/community partnership; and (7) be aware of partnership maturation and associated transition periods. The limitations of these principles and their application in various settings are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10198685     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00149-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  40 in total

1.  A case study of community-based participatory research ethics: the Healthy Public Housing Initiative.

Authors:  Doug Brugge; Alison Cole
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 2.  Health programs in faith-based organizations: are they effective?

Authors:  Mark J DeHaven; Irby B Hunter; Laura Wilder; James W Walton; Jarett Berry
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Trust the Process: Community-based Researcher Partnerships.

Authors:  Karen Edwards; Carrielynn Lund; Steven Mitchell; Neil Andersson
Journal:  Pimatisiwin       Date:  2008

4.  The SUCCEED Legacy Grant program: enhancing community capacity to implement evidence-based interventions in breast and cervical cancer.

Authors:  John Harvey Wingfield; Tabia Henry Akintobi; DeBran Jacobs; Marvella E Ford
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-05

5.  "It's like Tuskegee in reverse": a case study of ethical tensions in institutional review board review of community-based participatory research.

Authors:  Ruth E Malone; Valerie B Yerger; Carol McGruder; Erika Froelicher
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Public-academic partnerships: improving care for older persons with schizophrenia through an academic-community partnership.

Authors:  Laurie A Lindamer; Barry D Lebowitz; Richard L Hough; Piedad Garcia; Alfredo Aquirre; Maureen C Halpain; Colin Depp; Dilip V Jeste
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership.

Authors:  Suzanne Christopher; Vanessa Watts; Alma Knows His Gun McCormick; Sara Young
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Integrating epidemiology, education, and organizing for environmental justice: community health effects of industrial hog operations.

Authors:  Steve Wing; Rachel Avery Horton; Naeema Muhammad; Gary R Grant; Mansoureh Tajik; Kendall Thu
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Community member and faith leader perspectives on the process of building trusting relationships between communities and researchers.

Authors:  Kimberley D Lakes; Elaine Vaughan; Jennifer Pham; Tuyet Tran; Marissa Jones; Dean Baker; James M Swanson; Ellen Olshansky
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 4.689

10.  Strategies for assessing community challenges and strengths for cancer disparities participatory research and outreach.

Authors:  Clement K Gwede; Janelle M Menard; Dinorah Martinez-Tyson; Ji-Hyun Lee; Susan T Vadaparampil; Tapan A Padhya; Cathy D Meade
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2009-06-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.