Literature DB >> 10198490

Time for a change? The process of lengthening booking intervals in general practice.

M Williams1, R D Neal.   

Abstract

Longer booking intervals between appointments in general practice are generally seen as 'a good thing', and have a strong 'evidence base' to support them. Changing to longer booking intervals is regarded as a pipe dream by many general practitioners (GPs). This paper reports the process and outcomes of a change to longer booking intervals in one practice, identifies the key elements of the change, and examines lessons learned for the practice, to help other practices to do similarly. The most important factor in bringing about change was the influence of facilitation by outside parties; first, by management consultants who identified solutions to the practice's problems, and secondly, by recruitment to a research study. Other outside influences were an awareness of the success of other practices in changing to 10-minute booking intervals, and the increasing 'evidence base' to support such change. Internal influences on the process were a desire to change as a result a perception that the practice was under-performing, and the stress associated with this. As a result of the change, the number of doctor consultations fell and the number of nurse consultations rose, fewer patients reconsulted, and marginal improvements were reported on doctor and patient satisfaction. Other practices may benefit from such change; the use of management consultants as facilitators may instigate such change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10198490      PMCID: PMC1313274     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  9 in total

1.  Changes resulting from increasing appointment length: practical and theoretical issues.

Authors:  J L Campbell; J G Howie
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Long to short consultation ratio: a proxy measure of quality of care for general practice.

Authors:  J G Howie; A M Porter; D J Heaney; J L Hopton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Longer booking intervals in general practice: effects on doctors' stress and arousal.

Authors:  A Wilson; P McDonald; L Hayes; J Cooney
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Extending appointment length--the effect in one practice.

Authors:  A Wilson
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-01

5.  The "five minute" consultation: effect of time constraint on verbal communication.

Authors:  M O Roland; J Bartholomew; M J Courtenay; R W Morris; D C Morrell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-03-29

6.  The "five minute" consultation: effect of time constraint on clinical content and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  D C Morrell; M E Evans; R W Morris; M O Roland
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-03-29

7.  Consultation length: general practitioners' attitudes and practices.

Authors:  A D Wilson
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-05-04

8.  Attitudes to medical care, the organization of work, and stress among general practitioners.

Authors:  J G Howie; J L Hopton; D J Heaney; A M Porter
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Quality and the use of time in general practice: widening the discussion.

Authors:  J G Howie; A M Porter; J F Forbes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-04-15
  9 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Evolving general practice consultation in Britain: issues of length and context.

Authors:  George K Freeman; John P Horder; John G R Howie; A Pali Hungin; Alison P Hill; Nayan C Shah; Andrew Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-13

Review 2.  Future of primary healthcare education: current problems and potential solutions.

Authors:  J Lord
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Reflections on the doctor-patient relationship: from evidence and experience.

Authors:  Moira Stewart
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.386

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.