Literature DB >> 10197077

The effect of past use of the injectable contraceptive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate on bone mineral density in normal post-menopausal women.

B J Orr-Walker1, M C Evans, R W Ames, J M Clearwater, T Cundy, I R Reid.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), an injectable progestogen, is a widely used contraceptive acting primarily by inhibiting secretion of pituitary gonadotrophins, thus producing oestrogen deficiency. Cross-sectional and prospective studies in pre-menopausal women have shown DMPA use to be associated with reduced bone density, but bone density increases following discontinuation of the drug. Because fracture rates are low in pre-menopausal women, the principal concern arising from the effects of DMPA on bone is that there may be residual osteopenia in former users such that their post-menopausal fracture risk is increased. The present study addresses this question.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of bone density in post-menopausal former users of DPMA and controls.
SUBJECTS: Three hundred and forty-six normal post-menopausal women, of whom 34 had previously used DMPA. The median age at which DMPA use began was 41 years and the median duration of use was 3.0 years. MEASUREMENTS: Bone density was measured in the spine, proximal femur and total body by dual-energy, X-ray absorptiometry.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in bone density at any site between the women who had previously used DMPA and the others in the cohort. However, in those who had used DMPA for > 2 years there was a trend towards bone densities being lower in the former users, the differences from non-users being 1.6% in the lumbar spine (P = 0.6), 3.1% in the femoral neck (P = 0.4) and 0.5% in the total body (P = 0.8). There was no correlation between bone densities and the duration of DMPA use, the age at discontinuation of DMPA, or the time between DMPA discontinuation and the menopause.
CONCLUSIONS: Any residual effects of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate use on post-menopausal bone density are small and therefore unlikely to have a substantial impact on fracture risk in the post-menopausal years.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biology; Comparative Studies; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents, Female--side effects; Contraceptive Agents, Progestin--side effects; Contraceptive Agents--side effects; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Family Planning; Longterm Effects--women; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate--side effects; New Zealand; Oceania; Osteoporosis--women; Physiology; Population; Population Dynamics; Research Methodology; Research Report; Risk Factors--women; Skeletal Effects; Studies; Time Factors; Women

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10197077     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1998.00582.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)        ISSN: 0300-0664            Impact factor:   3.478


  7 in total

Review 1.  Contraception in women with medical problems.

Authors:  Mandish K Dhanjal
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2008-12-01

Review 2.  Update on hormonal contraception and bone density.

Authors:  Michelle M Isley; Andrew M Kaunitz
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 3.  Hormonal contraception and HIV-positive women: metabolic concerns and management strategies.

Authors:  Julie Womack; Susan Richman; Phyllis C Tien; Margaret Grey; Ann Williams
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 4.  Endometriosis: current therapies and new pharmacological developments.

Authors:  Paolo Vercellini; Edgardo Somigliana; Paola Viganò; Annalisa Abbiati; Giussy Barbara; Pier Giorgio Crosignani
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Reversible contraception update: the importance of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Renee E Mestad; Jessica Kenerson; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Bone mineral density in adolescent females using injectable or oral contraceptives: a 24-month prospective study.

Authors:  Barbara A Cromer; Andrea E Bonny; Margaret Stager; Rina Lazebnik; Ellen Rome; Julie Ziegler; Kelly Camlin-Shingler; Michelle Secic
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  A three-year longitudinal evaluation of the forearm bone density of users of etonogestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants.

Authors:  Cecilia Monteiro-Dantas; Ximena Espejo-Arce; Jeffrey F Lui-Filho; Arlete M Fernandes; Ilza Monteiro; Luis Bahamondes
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 3.223

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.