Literature DB >> 10195858

The patients perspective of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

N Mahmood1, W Turner, K Rowgaski, D Almond.   

Abstract

We studied the effect of a single analgesic regime for outpatient lithotripsy on the patient's perception of pain and the disruption of their normal activities by sending a postal questionnaire to 200 patients. Results showed that 15% of patients received insufficient analgesia during ESWL, 25% considered treatment painful, 6.8% had side effects from analgesia, 18% had delayed return to their normal activities and 33% contacted their doctor within a week of lithotripsy with problems related to it. This study shows that analgesic requirements of patients treated with modern lithotriptors are underestimated. This can be avoided by tailoring analgesia to individual needs and better patient communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10195858     DOI: 10.1007/bf02564851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  9 in total

1.  Efficacy of second generation lithotriptors: a multicenter comparative study of 2,206 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatments with the Siemens Lithostar, Dornier HM4, Wolf Piezolith 2300, Direx Tripter X-1 and Breakstone lithotriptors.

Authors:  A F Bierkens; A J Hendrikx; V J de Kort; T de Reyke; C A Bruynen; E R Bouve; T V Beek; P Vos; H V Berkel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Analgesia in anesthesia-free extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a standardized protocol.

Authors:  D B Allman; D M Richlin; M Ruttenberg; J R Sotolongo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the first 50 patients treated in Britain.

Authors:  J E Wickham; D R Webb; S R Payne; M J Kellet; G Watkinson; H N Whitfield
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-04-20

4.  The mobile lithotriptor: an answer for the smaller centre.

Authors:  A J Dickinson; D Cranston; A Doble; D P Fawcett; G J Fellows; A W Pengelly; J C Smith
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1993-04

5.  The opioid-sparing effect of diclofenac sodium in outpatient extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).

Authors:  B Fredman; R Jedeikin; D Olsfanger; M Aronheim
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 9.452

6.  Does combined epidural lignocaine and fentanyl provide better anaesthesia for ESWL than lignocaine alone?

Authors:  R J Cook; R Neerhut; D G Thomas
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.669

7.  Use of local anesthesia for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  S Loening; E V Kramolowsky; B Willoughby
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Choosing the correct pain relief for extracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  C Dawson; J A Vale; D A Corry; N P Cohen; J Gallagher; I B Nockler; H N Whitfield
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1994-09

9.  Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves.

Authors:  C Chaussy; W Brendel; E Schmiedt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-12-13       Impact factor: 79.321

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  The protective effects of the traditional Chinese herbs against renal damage induced by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a clinical study.

Authors:  Binwu Sheng; Dalin He; Jun Zhao; Xingfa Chen; Xunyi Nan
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-07-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.