Literature DB >> 10195548

The target plasma concentration of propofol required to place laryngeal mask versus cuffed oropharyngeal airway.

A Casati1, G Fanelli, E Casaletti, V Cedrati, F Veglia, G Torri.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: To determine the target plasma concentration of propofol required to place either a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) or a cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA), we started a continuous target-controlled infusion of propofol in 60 ASA physical status I or II unpremedicated patients scheduled for minor orthopedic surgery with peripheral nerve block. The target plasma concentration of propofol was initially set at 2 microg/mL. When the effect-site calculated concentration of propofol was equal to the plasma concentration according to the computer simulation, the target plasma concentration was increased by 0.5-microg/mL steps until successful placement of either the LMA (n = 30) or the COPA (n = 30). The mean target plasma concentration of propofol required to place a LMA was 4.3 +/- 0.8 microg/mL compared with 3.2 +/- 0.6 microg/mL to place a COPA (P < 0.001). To successfully place the airways in 95% of patients, the target plasma concentration of propofol had to be increased up to 4 microg/mL for the COPA and 6 microg/mL for the LMA. We conclude that placing a LMA in healthy, unpremedicated patients requires target plasma concentrations of propofol higher than those required for placing a COPA. IMPLICATIONS: We evaluated the use of target-controlled infusion of propofol to place extratracheal airways in this prospective, randomized study and demonstrated that the target plasma concentration of propofol required to successfully place a laryngeal mask in >95% of healthy, unpremedicated patients is 6 microg/mL, compared with 4 microg/mL to place a cuffed oropharyngeal airway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10195548     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199904000-00043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial of the effect of preoperative dexmedetomidine on the half maximal effective concentration of propofol for successful i-gel insertion without muscle relaxants.

Authors:  Young-Eun Jang; Yong-Chul Kim; Hyun-Kyu Yoon; Young-Tae Jeon; Jung-Won Hwang; Eugene Kim; Hee-Pyoung Park
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Effects of anesthetic agents on inflammation in Caco-2, HK-2 and HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Weijing Li; Xiaoguang Hao; Yan Liu; Tong Tong; Hongmeng Xu; Li Jia
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Low dose of fentanyl reduces predicted effect-site concentration of propofol for flexible laryngeal mask airway insertion.

Authors:  Junko Yumura; Yoshihiko Koukita; Ken-ichi Fukuda; Yuzuru Kaneko; Tatsuya Ichinohe
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  A Potential Mechanism of Sodium Channel Mediating the General Anesthesia Induced by Propofol.

Authors:  Jinglei Xiao; Zhengguo Chen; Buwei Yu
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 5.505

5.  Prolonged Treatment with Propofol Transiently Impairs Proliferation but Not Survival of Rat Neural Progenitor Cells In Vitro.

Authors:  Arvind Palanisamy; Matthew B Friese; Emily Cotran; Ludde Moller; Justin D Boyd; Gregory Crosby; Deborah J Culley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Male patients require higher optimal effect-site concentrations of propofol during i-gel insertion with dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg.

Authors:  Jung Ju Choi; Ji Young Kim; Dongchul Lee; Young Jin Chang; Noo Ree Cho; Hyun Jeong Kwak
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.217

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.