Literature DB >> 10195535

The effect of stimulus frequency on the analgesic response to percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with chronic low back pain.

E S Ghoname1, W F Craig, P F White, H E Ahmed, M A Hamza, N M Gajraj, A S Vakharia, C E Noe.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common medical problems in our society. Increasingly, patients are turning to nonpharmacologic analgesic therapies such as percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS). We designed this sham-controlled study to compare the effect of three different frequencies of electrical stimulation on the analgesic response to PENS therapy. Sixty-eight consenting patients with LBP secondary to degenerative lumbar disc disease were treated with PENS therapy at 4 Hz, alternating 15 Hz and 30 Hz (15/30 Hz), and 100 Hz, as well as sham-PENS (0 Hz), according to a randomized, cross-over study design. Each treatment was administered for a period of 30 min three times per week for 2 wk. The pre- and posttreatment assessments included the health status survey short form and visual analog scales for pain, physical activity, and quality of sleep. After receiving all four treatments, patients completed a global assessment questionnaire. The sham-PENS treatments failed to produce changes in the degree of pain, physical activity, sleep quality, or daily intake of oral analgesic medications. In contrast, 4-Hz, 15/30-Hz, and 100-Hz stimulation all produced significant decreases in the severity of pain, increases in physical activity, improvements in the quality of sleep, and decreases in oral analgesic requirements (P < 0.01). Of the three frequencies, 15/30 Hz was the most effective in decreasing pain, increasing physical activity, and improving the quality of sleep (P < 0.05). In the global assessment, 40% of the patients reported that 15/30 Hz was the most desirable therapy, and it was also more effective in improving the patient's sense of well-being. We conclude that the frequency of electrical stimulation is an important determinant of the analgesic response to PENS therapy. Alternating stimulation at 15-Hz and 30-Hz frequencies was more effective than either 4 Hz or 100 Hz in improving outcome measures in patients with LBP. IMPLICATIONS: The frequency of electrical stimulation seems to be an important determinant of the analgesic efficacy of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Mixed low- and high-frequency stimulation was more effective than either low or high frequencies alone in the treatment of patients with low back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10195535     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199904000-00030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  9 in total

Review 1.  Imperfect placebos are common in low back pain trials: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  L A C Machado; S J Kamper; R D Herbert; C G Maher; J H McAuley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Evidence-Based Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ryan S D'Souza; Ross Barman; Amira Joseph; Alaa Abd-Elsayed
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2022-06-18

3.  Effects of percutaneous neuromodulation in neuromusculoskeletal pathologies: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ibon Fidalgo-Martin; Juan José Ramos-Álvarez; Roberto Murias-Lozano; Elena Sonsoles Rodríguez-López
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  A novel image-guided, automatic, high-intensity neurostimulation device for the treatment of nonspecific low back pain.

Authors:  Miguel Gorenberg; Elad Schiff; Kobi Schwartz; Elon Eizenberg
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2011-04-21

5.  Temporal divergence of changes in pain and pain-free grip strength after manual acupuncture or electroacupuncture: an experimental study in people with lateral epicondylalgia.

Authors:  Jaewon Jeon; Erin Bussin; Alex Scott
Journal:  Chin Med       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.455

6.  Efficacy of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and therapeutic exercise for older adults with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Debra K Weiner; Subashan Perera; Thomas E Rudy; Ronald M Glick; Sonali Shenoy; Anthony Delitto
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 7.926

7.  Imaging-guided hyperstimulation analgesia in low back pain.

Authors:  Miguel Gorenberg; Kobi Schwartz
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.133

8.  Effects of two different intensities of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain thresholds of contralateral muscles in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Katsuyoshi Tanaka; Masahiko Ikeuchi; Masashi Izumi; Koji Aso; Natsuki Sugimura; Hayato Enoki; Yasunori Nagano; Kenji Ishida; Toshikazu Tani
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-09-30

9.  Novel Noxipoint Therapy versus Conventional Physical Therapy for Chronic Neck and Shoulder Pain: Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Charles C Koo; Ray S Lin; Tyng-Guey Wang; Jau-Yih Tsauo; Pan-Chyr Yang; Chen-Tung Yen; Sandip Biswal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.